The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interventions for preventing lower limb soft‐tissue running injuries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001256.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Simon S Yeung, Ella W Yeung, Lesley D Gillespie |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 17% |
Netherlands | 2 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
Norway | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
Scientists | 3 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 680 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | <1% |
Netherlands | 5 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | <1% |
Unknown | 656 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 126 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 101 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 9% |
Researcher | 60 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 46 | 7% |
Other | 137 | 20% |
Unknown | 146 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 211 | 31% |
Sports and Recreations | 102 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 91 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 19 | 3% |
Other | 57 | 8% |
Unknown | 181 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2022.
All research outputs
#589,103
of 26,327,128 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#982
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,057
of 130,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,327,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.