The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
In vitro bioaccessibility and antioxidant properties of edible bird’s nest following simulated human gastro-intestinal digestion
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-14-468 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhang Yida, Mustapha Umar Imam, Maznah Ismail |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 20% |
Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
Researcher | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 28 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 16% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 31 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,200,857
of 24,084,574 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#765
of 3,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,081
of 368,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#22
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,084,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.