↓ Skip to main content

Isha Yoga Practices and Participation in Samyama Program are Associated with Reduced HbA1C and Systemic Inflammation, Improved Lipid Profile, and Short-Term and Sustained Improvement in Mental Health…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
276 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Isha Yoga Practices and Participation in Samyama Program are Associated with Reduced HbA1C and Systemic Inflammation, Improved Lipid Profile, and Short-Term and Sustained Improvement in Mental Health: A Prospective Observational Study of Meditators
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659667
Pubmed ID
Authors

Senthilkumar Sadhasivam, Suresh Alankar, Raj Maturi, Amy Williams, Ramana V. Vishnubhotla, Sepideh Hariri, Mayur Mudigonda, Dhanashri Pawale, Sangeeth Dubbireddi, Senthil Packiasabapathy, Peter Castelluccio, Chithra Ram, Janelle Renschler, Tracy Chang, Balachundhar Subramaniam

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 276 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Researcher 4 4%
Lecturer 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 60 62%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 64 66%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 242. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#165,821
of 26,589,560 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#353
of 35,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,776
of 463,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#12
of 1,274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,589,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.