↓ Skip to main content

Mismatch of Visual-Vestibular Information in Virtual Reality: Is Motion Sickness Part of the Brains Attempt to Reduce the Prediction Error?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mismatch of Visual-Vestibular Information in Virtual Reality: Is Motion Sickness Part of the Brains Attempt to Reduce the Prediction Error?
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2021
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2021.757735
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthias Nürnberger, Carsten Klingner, Otto W. Witte, Stefan Brodoehl

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 28 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 13%
Computer Science 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 28 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,735,368
of 26,490,075 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,681
of 7,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,004
of 448,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#25
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,490,075 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.