The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic Background Limits Generalizability of Genotype-Phenotype Relationships
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuron, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.08.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura J. Sittig, Peter Carbonetto, Kyle A. Engel, Kathleen S. Krauss, Camila M. Barrios-Camacho, Abraham A. Palmer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 7% |
| Canada | 6 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 53% |
| Scientists | 41 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 220 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 58 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 27% |
| Neuroscience | 51 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2024.
All research outputs
#607,358
of 26,473,472 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#1,065
of 9,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,212
of 346,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#26
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,473,472 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.