@staal1978 @RafaelFrias Absolutely! Just adding here another nice ref which might be known to you already, on added value of creating and testing F1 in different backgrounds https://t.co/ODGopcyRBg
Do we really think we can deeply understand genome-phenome-behavior-environment synthesis with N of 1 genome? Even the ABA’s own paper shows this is exceedingly unwise. What parts of these papers are unclear to neuroscientist? https://t.co/J45kOL6Mwt ht
Carlos, yes a cool study. But one fully inbred version of a wild-caught mouse is not a compelling finding. Look at this paper by Sittig and Palmer in Neuron. https://t.co/B1CjpoQpR3 Here is the effect of a single mutations on different backgrounds—chose-
Want proof? Read Hacker News today on this article. It is off the deep-end in human implications. https://t.co/eNWtSWo1OI Did editors not read papers in their own journal? Read this—a great paper by Sittig et al in Neuron published in 2016 https://t.co