The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Defining Satisfactory Methods of Treatment in Rare Diseases When Evaluating Significant Benefit–The EU Regulator's Perspective
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.744625 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria E. Sheean, Frauke Naumann-Winter, Giuseppe Capovilla, Maria Elisabeth Kalland, Eva Malikova, Segundo Mariz, Darius Matusevicius, Robert Nistico, Brigitte Schwarzer-Daum, Stelios Tsigkos, Kyriaki Tzogani, Kristina Larsson, Armando Magrelli, Violeta Stoyanova-Beninska |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 38% |
Professor | 1 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,602,154
of 23,347,114 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,550
of 5,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,380
of 430,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#123
of 425 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,347,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 425 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.