You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of vitamin D on cognitive functions in healthy individuals: A systematic review in randomized controlled clinical trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.987203 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ana Beatriz Januário da Silva, Waleska Maria Almeida Barros, Mayara Luclécia da Silva, José Maurício Lucas Silva, Ana Patrícia da Silva Souza, Karollainy Gomes da Silva, Matheus Santos de Sousa Fernandes, Antonietta Cláudia Barbosa da Fonseca Carneiro, Ana Elisa Toscano, Cláudia Jacques Lagranha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 24 | 89% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,344,337
of 26,220,821 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,728
of 35,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,404
of 499,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#70
of 1,712 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,220,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,712 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.