The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dietary supplementation with jasmine flower residue improves meat quality and flavor of goat
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2023.1145841 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jinxing Wang, Renhong Lu, Yehong Li, Junzhi Lu, Qiong Liang, Zihua Zheng, Heng Huang, Fuchang Deng, Huali Huang, Huimin Jiang, Junjie Hu, Ming Feng, Peng Xiao, Xiaogan Yang, Xingwei Liang, Jun Zeng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#18,455,442
of 23,698,019 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,153
of 5,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,390
of 362,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#195
of 455 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,698,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 455 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.