The importance of falsification endpoints in observational studies of vaccination to prevent severe disease: A critique of a harm–benefit analysis of BNT162b2 vaccination of 5- to 11-year-olds
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
2
25%
Medicine and Dentistry
2
25%
Social Sciences
1
13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
1
13%
Unknown
2
25%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2024.
All research outputs
#671,550
of 26,802,760 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiology & Infection
#93
of 4,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,749
of 361,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiology & Infection
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,802,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
