The importance of falsification endpoints in observational studies of vaccination to prevent severe disease: A critique of a harm–benefit analysis of BNT162b2 vaccination of 5- to 11-year-olds

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiology & Infection, February 2024

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 106 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 8 Mendeley

Summary X

So far, Altmetric has seen 112 X posts from 106 X users, with an upper bound of 1,587,375 followers.

RT @TracyBethHoeg: The majority of parents were right to trust their intuition that we didn't & don't have good evidence the net benefits o…

02 Mar 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @TracyBethHoeg: The majority of parents were right to trust their intuition that we didn't & don't have good evidence the net benefits o…

02 Mar 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

Pitfalls of Using Observational Studies in Harm-Benefit analyses of BNT161b2 vaccination of 5-11-Year-Olds | Epidemiology & Infection | Cambridge Core https://t.co/pU1EB9WZRK

24 Feb 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @kynohy: .@DrJBhattacharya ** corrected link

21 Feb 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 108 additional X posts.