You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Role of Circadian Rhythms in Muscular and Osseous Physiology and Their Regulation by Nutrition and Exercise
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2017.00063 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shinya Aoyama, Shigenobu Shibata |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 5 | 26% |
United States | 2 | 11% |
New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Chile | 1 | 5% |
Mexico | 1 | 5% |
Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
Scientists | 4 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 153 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 15% |
Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
Researcher | 18 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Unknown | 53 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 8 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 13% |
Unknown | 58 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,646,953
of 25,844,183 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#807
of 11,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,025
of 436,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#11
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.