The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The V223I substitution in hemagglutinin reduces the binding affinity to human-type receptors while enhancing the thermal stability of the H3N2 canine influenza virus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1442163 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Liling Liu, Fujun Wang, Ying Wu, Weiyong Mi, Yaping Zhang, Lei Chen, Dongxue Wang, Guohua Deng, Jianzhong Shi, Hualan Chen, Huihui Kong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2024.
All research outputs
#15,618,644
of 26,436,676 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#11,431
of 30,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,343
of 185,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#31
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,436,676 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.