You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Durum wheat genome highlights past domestication signatures and future improvement targets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-019-0381-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marco Maccaferri, Neil S. Harris, Sven O. Twardziok, Raj K. Pasam, Heidrun Gundlach, Manuel Spannagl, Danara Ormanbekova, Thomas Lux, Verena M. Prade, Sara G. Milner, Axel Himmelbach, Martin Mascher, Paolo Bagnaresi, Primetta Faccioli, Paolo Cozzi, Massimiliano Lauria, Barbara Lazzari, Alessandra Stella, Andrea Manconi, Matteo Gnocchi, Marco Moscatelli, Raz Avni, Jasline Deek, Sezgi Biyiklioglu, Elisabetta Frascaroli, Simona Corneti, Silvio Salvi, Gabriella Sonnante, Francesca Desiderio, Caterina Marè, Cristina Crosatti, Erica Mica, Hakan Özkan, Benjamin Kilian, Pasquale De Vita, Daniela Marone, Reem Joukhadar, Elisabetta Mazzucotelli, Domenica Nigro, Agata Gadaleta, Shiaoman Chao, Justin D. Faris, Arthur T. O. Melo, Mike Pumphrey, Nicola Pecchioni, Luciano Milanesi, Krystalee Wiebe, Jennifer Ens, Ron P. MacLachlan, John M. Clarke, Andrew G. Sharpe, Chu Shin Koh, Kevin Y. H. Liang, Gregory J. Taylor, Ron Knox, Hikmet Budak, Anna M. Mastrangelo, Steven S. Xu, Nils Stein, Iago Hale, Assaf Distelfeld, Matthew J. Hayden, Roberto Tuberosa, Sean Walkowiak, Klaus F. X. Mayer, Aldo Ceriotti, Curtis J. Pozniak, Luigi Cattivelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 205 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 14% |
| Canada | 11 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 4% |
| Germany | 7 | 3% |
| Australia | 6 | 3% |
| India | 5 | 2% |
| Italy | 5 | 2% |
| Turkey | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 109 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 115 | 56% |
| Scientists | 82 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 463 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 463 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 98 | 21% |
| Researcher | 76 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 12% |
| Unknown | 150 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 224 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 4 | <1% |
| Engineering | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 3% |
| Unknown | 160 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 290. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#125,796
of 26,090,071 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#183
of 7,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,463
of 369,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#9
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,090,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.