RT @CarstenBKK: #Covid19 Aerosol can stay up to 3 hours. https://t.co/z7sx0w0lN6
RT @CarstenBKK: #Covid19 Aerosol can stay up to 3 hours. https://t.co/z7sx0w0lN6
RT @CarstenBKK: #Covid19 Aerosol can stay up to 3 hours. https://t.co/z7sx0w0lN6
#Covid19 Aerosol can stay up to 3 hours. https://t.co/z7sx0w0lN6
@Rrrrrooolalala @SPostillons « On copper, no viable SARS-CoV-2 was measured after 4 hours ». Donc oui, en 4 heures... 😁 https://t.co/9ZCE7utlkc https://t.co/RyJ8O1y3lB
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 8⃣🔴Personas q sospechen o esté confirmado que lo presentan A partir de ahí estaría bien q las campañas d divulgación vay…
RT @Ssrichart11: @JayHart909 I tend to agree with that. Although the virus might stay on a surface for days, its ability to infect someone…
@GeeGeeAkili @realDonaldTrump I believe they are correct. While the virus might remain on surfaces for days, it becomes less and less viable as time passes. https://t.co/Z4Ek6XCKXx
@JayHart909 I tend to agree with that. Although the virus might stay on a surface for days, its ability to infect someone tends to drop dramatically. https://t.co/Z4Ek6XCKXx
@AliciaNoved @GeloPerezMo @Alvisepf @sanchezcastejon @WHO Además, aquí te adjunto un artículo científico donde estudian el virus sobre diferentes superficies y su capacidad de infectar según las superficies (https://t.co/bMSX6YTYJI). Hay muchos más, pero y
RT @DbDant: @ukexpat19 Figure 1. Viability of SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 in Aerosols and on Various Surfaces. https://t.co/rObBA2fIoJ
RT @RobertDDyson: @TheEconomist Read the real note: https://t.co/pFdPaQipwY
results indicate aerosol+fomite transmission SARS-CoV-2 plausible, virus remain viable n infectious in aerosols hours n surfaces up to days (depending inoculum shed) findings echo those w SARS-CoV-1@in which forms transmission assoc w nosocomial spread n s
@11thHour @BWilliams Your concern about the CDC's changing message was justified. Coronavirus does live on surfaces even though the primary transmission is respiratory. Neither your MD expert nor the CDC addressed the implications of this data today. https
@DraconesHc @scott4670 @EdDarrell @snazzygina @KrutikaKuppalli Here you go... AGAIN I guess you cent read? https://t.co/vI0WktNqpk
RT @alex_instead: 4 hours on copper. 24 hours on cardboard. 72 hours on plastic and stainless steel. https://t.co/J6LBeTJUMM
@Psicocursos Hola @Psicocursos , todo depende de las condiciones; tamaño de las gotas de aerosol, humedad, temperatura... te dejo este artículo al respecto: https://t.co/B2SkUWGlf7
⚠️¿Cuánto tiempo permanece el #coronavirus en el aire o en superficies?🤔 -Aire(aerosoles): 3 horas -Cobre: 8 horas -Cartón: 1 día -Acero: 2 días -Plástico: 3 días https://t.co/3Lj7x84Rfa
@jmvinie @RCSalvarezza @DefLaCienArg Supongo que se sigue estudiando pero ya hay resultados sobre eso, para otras superficies, no piel 1) https://t.co/TBf8tbi5CX 2) https://t.co/GXGW9YsEM9 https://t.co/Mc6Nn0SdhV
@ukexpat19 Figure 1. Viability of SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 in Aerosols and on Various Surfaces. https://t.co/rObBA2fIoJ
@zack488 @nacholeber I prefer to follow the peer-reviewed transmission data. Transmissibility only both proximal symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals is repeatedly shown via droplets, aerosols, and fomites. https://t.co/Rrxy0DZqMS https://t.co/1TJk6
@molokoloco Au bout de 18h je veux bien mais au bout de 3h il semble encore rester de la charge virale active en suspension (cf. https://t.co/mbKqHQSWn8). Si je sors et qu'il y a du monde autour, même en extérieur je mets un masque. Mais je résous le probl
SARS-CoV-2 was more stable on plastic and stainless steel than on copper and cardboard, and viable virus was detected up to 72 hours after application to these surfaces https://t.co/dEjk2gQrf8
Do we know for flu, common cold, or other respiratory viruses what the relative contributions to infections/cases are for different transmission routes? I'm sure it's hard to test. Studies on SARS2 stability on surfaces are good but not the whole picture.
@SmittySmittyBan @chadhassler @Cernovich @NYGovCuomo It has also been shown to be more “resilient” to disinfectants which would mean that masks would have significantly more pros than not wearing one https://t.co/VAOEfHpAYt
@MRkumar23 @Medical_Nomad_ @PTI_News Heyy @Medical_Nomad_ !!! फ़र्ज़ी डाक्टर https://t.co/xRWGQER32Q https://t.co/qDeDAL3Ahv Leave aside medicine, अगर अंग्रेज़ी पढ़ने का हौंसला हो तो इसको पढ़ लियो । And don’t hide behind bots/meme/gif/RT groups.
@bibcoruna Igual que os humanos? A información científica publicada non sinala en absoluto tanta resistencia do virus sobre os materiais: https://t.co/vzoL8gyOVs Sábese que fonte manexa o Ministerio para establecer esas directrices?
RT @alex_instead: 4 hours on copper. 24 hours on cardboard. 72 hours on plastic and stainless steel. https://t.co/J6LBeTJUMM
@ForYoursel @tobysonthenba @necrofamicom @snackcakes @NBCDFW However, the only actual study I know regarding surfaces says 24 hours for cardboard and 3 days for plastic. https://t.co/3DOXtuBeDB
4 hours on copper. 24 hours on cardboard. 72 hours on plastic and stainless steel. https://t.co/J6LBeTJUMM
@AnUncivilPhD @kasiabrenna New England Journal of Medicine published a study looking at how long the virus remains on surfaces I think paper would be similar to cardboard time wise https://t.co/pMAvZJhxvz
@seanhannity They still say to disinfect surfaces....and really, how do you think it spreads? You think masks are BS too, so what do you recommend people do? And FYI, there has been scientific studies done https://t.co/vIsuIs2Ja1 & https://t.co/1cxSrh
@Baba_Lilith @OscarRLanza It's not arbitrary, it's extremely careful. The virus cannot be detected after 24 hours on paper https://t.co/mxAar8lftQ
RT @alfabravo0258: En binnen in een gebouw is het een illusie dat 1.5m genoeg is. Als 1 iemand hoest die besmet is in een afgesloten ruimte…
RT @alfabravo0258: En binnen in een gebouw is het een illusie dat 1.5m genoeg is. Als 1 iemand hoest die besmet is in een afgesloten ruimte…
RT @dianalunareja: Explican que el virus es susceptible a desinfectantes y claramente mencionan que **SÍ hay estudios que han detectado la…
@denise_dewald @angie_rasmussen Nothing cavalier about it. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 and comparisons to SARS-CoV-1 linked. https://t.co/MoCjjbcdsh
Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1 | NEJM https://t.co/e9txC6sVLY
@ccarballo50 SARS CoV-2 ,dos vias de contagio: -directo persona a persona. -a traves de fomites(cualquier objeto, o superficie capaz transportar el virus) https://t.co/qarmDAGIoN
@DraconesHc @scott4670 @EdDarrell @snazzygina @KrutikaKuppalli Just in case you missed the other post https://t.co/vI0Wku51NU
@MortAndRickty Es un estudio de The New England Journal of Medicine, aquí tienes el enlace al mismo: https://t.co/KvvmB6OCUW
@olivier_ritz @Paris Le virus peut rester assez longtemps sur des objets. https://t.co/IYOpVTVEcS
Did you see this article @OneEyedYoda ? Surfaces.
Is 6ft enough and at what point does the WHO and CDC talk about the potential of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2? Three studies on transmission by air with the newest one published today. #covid19 https://t.co/nurQajhx77 https://t.co/edY3E6HWa5 htt
RT @RobertDDyson: @TheEconomist Read the real note: https://t.co/pFdPaQipwY
RT @UPIguy: CoronaVirus Intelligence Bits 'N Pieces: Fomite Transmission - SARS-CoV-2 was more stable [ infectious existence duration ] on…
@sandentotten @LAist Various studies have come out showing minutes and up to 3 hours that it can remain in aerosols. 8 Minutes: https://t.co/edY3E6HWa5 Up to 3 hours: https://t.co/5LCmJVFCNW
@Mr_Bugman Mejor cuídese, Mr. Bugman. Hay que abrir con protocolos y educación porque nos fundimos, pero no minimizar. Esto es ciencia, no mitos ni conspiración. Sí hay malandraje que aprovecha. Pero cuídese que no es joda el bicho. https://t.co/3DoSk3WeU
CoronaVirus Intelligence Bits 'N Pieces: Fomite Transmission - SARS-CoV-2 was more stable [ infectious existence duration ] on 'plastic' and 'stainless steel' than on 'copper' and 'cardboard', and viable virus was detected up to 7…https://t.co/h2K5bq8obp
Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1 | NEJM https://t.co/inBJlFzHyh
@MichaelG398 Translate the scientific jargon in these studies and apply some logic: https://t.co/nhHyDT8UdB
@BertaGDeVega En este estudio dicen que el SARS-CoV-2 es viable hasta 72h en acero y plástico, y en cartón (libros) hasta 24h. https://t.co/pTQk19ediN
RT @BhadeliaMD: Once we shed it in the environment, it can be in the air for hours if in enclosed spaces and on a whole range of surfaces b…
@Elenbsa
@OB10152 @kuatoring @SexCounseling You're wrong. https://t.co/drK9FOnyZm
Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1 | NEJM https://t.co/qE5SWtdlbR
RT @BhadeliaMD: Once we shed it in the environment, it can be in the air for hours if in enclosed spaces and on a whole range of surfaces b…
RT @BhadeliaMD: Once we shed it in the environment, it can be in the air for hours if in enclosed spaces and on a whole range of surfaces b…
Once we shed it in the environment, it can be in the air for hours if in enclosed spaces and on a whole range of surfaces between hours to a day or so. It dies over time though so that's good news. https://t.co/qBovhorVWk
@BrionneCranlei1 @pjpeterman @allisonpearson @BBCNews It depends on the surface material. https://t.co/frllsXdRSV
RT @dianalunareja: Explican que el virus es susceptible a desinfectantes y claramente mencionan que **SÍ hay estudios que han detectado la…
@taci_kalkavan Ben veriyorum ve afiyetle yiyorum valla. Sindirim yoluyla bulasmiyor sonucta. :) Kuryelerden hastalik bulasma olasiligi da cok dusukmus su calismaya gore: https://t.co/0D8Huxt4ZZ
1/ Coronavirus... 1 "... was more stable on plastic and stainless steel than on copper and cardboard, and viable virus was detected up to 72 hours" 2 "...remained viable in aerosols (suspended in the air) throughout the duration of our experiment (3 hrs)"
@KiCKLOCHONE Fascinating. And yet... https://t.co/zgvvvRoP9P
@_Halecks_ @abc_es @WHO Aquí tiene uno de ellos publicado en Marzo. Hasta 3 días en plástico! Saludos https://t.co/lUEh0AB3Fu
Apropos genåbning af bibliotekerne https://t.co/lRUivewOSH https://t.co/WKvB3ggteA
RT @jnewsham: Factcheck:How long does COVID-19 last on surfaces Answer: It depends on the material and it can remain on certain surfaces fo…
RT @jnewsham: Factcheck:How long does COVID-19 last on surfaces Answer: It depends on the material and it can remain on certain surfaces fo…
RT @jnewsham: Factcheck:How long does COVID-19 last on surfaces Answer: It depends on the material and it can remain on certain surfaces fo…
RT @jnewsham: Factcheck:How long does COVID-19 last on surfaces Answer: It depends on the material and it can remain on certain surfaces fo…
RT @jnewsham: Factcheck:How long does COVID-19 last on surfaces Answer: It depends on the material and it can remain on certain surfaces fo…
RT @dianalunareja: Explican que el virus es susceptible a desinfectantes y claramente mencionan que **SÍ hay estudios que han detectado la…
RT @dianalunareja: Explican que el virus es susceptible a desinfectantes y claramente mencionan que **SÍ hay estudios que han detectado la…
RT @dianalunareja: Explican que el virus es susceptible a desinfectantes y claramente mencionan que **SÍ hay estudios que han detectado la…
RT @jnewsham: Factcheck:How long does COVID-19 last on surfaces Answer: It depends on the material and it can remain on certain surfaces fo…
RT @jnewsham: Factcheck:How long does COVID-19 last on surfaces Answer: It depends on the material and it can remain on certain surfaces fo…
Factcheck:How long does COVID-19 last on surfaces Answer: It depends on the material and it can remain on certain surfaces for up to several days. SOURCE The New England Journey of Medicine https://t.co/J0kzgQB50S https://t.co/ll9u4H9XmL
RT @dianalunareja: Explican que el virus es susceptible a desinfectantes y claramente mencionan que **SÍ hay estudios que han detectado la…
Explican que el virus es susceptible a desinfectantes y claramente mencionan que **SÍ hay estudios que han detectado la permanencia del virus contagioso en superficies** Citan primero el estudio del New England Journal of Medicine: https://t.co/exI2d6iJP6
@p13tobler @3Heckmonwyke Yes Paul you are absolutely correct, the virus lives on different surfaces for different lengths of time. I'm sorry to say people going around calling others thick when they do not understand what we are facing should be ashamed of
@_RojoEnfurecido @Angelm105 @el_pais Efectivamente, todos buscaban los “hechos” la “evidencia” al 120%, aún sabiendo las altas probabilidades para tomar decisiones, hasta que salió este artículo el 16 marzo, https://t.co/MUzUNtFPM5 días antes del cierre 🇺🇸
RT @CJR0bertson: @chrisnayloruk SARS-cov-2 can be detected in vapour phase 3 hours after being sprayed in an atomised solution. 3hrs was wh…
@OscarRLanza Nothing is certain yet, but the 5-7 days for paper seems long https://t.co/mhqiI8GGax https://t.co/WGtJrvZ9f8
RT @CJR0bertson: @chrisnayloruk SARS-cov-2 can be detected in vapour phase 3 hours after being sprayed in an atomised solution. 3hrs was wh…
RT @CJR0bertson: @chrisnayloruk SARS-cov-2 can be detected in vapour phase 3 hours after being sprayed in an atomised solution. 3hrs was wh…