RT @RaquelBlascoR: #ResponsabilidadSocial Insistimos con el valor de distancia social y #mascarilla La #transmisión de SARS-CoV-2 en aeros…
RT @lmcastaldi: Quanto tempo resiste un Sars-Cov-2 sulla carta? Solo 3 ore secondo alcuni (https://t.co/RG8mYXKQWq), al 24 ore per altri (h…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: #ResponsabilidadSocial Insistimos con el valor de distancia social y #mascarilla La #transmisión de SARS-CoV-2 en aeros…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: #ResponsabilidadSocial Insistimos con el valor de distancia social y #mascarilla La #transmisión de SARS-CoV-2 en aeros…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: #ResponsabilidadSocial Insistimos con el valor de distancia social y #mascarilla La #transmisión de SARS-CoV-2 en aeros…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: #ResponsabilidadSocial Insistimos con el valor de distancia social y #mascarilla La #transmisión de SARS-CoV-2 en aeros…
”The virus can remain viable and infectious in aerosols for hours.” Good ventilation is essential. #corona Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1 | NEJM https://t.co/gLxTtNVVlB
RT @RaquelBlascoR: #ResponsabilidadSocial Insistimos con el valor de distancia social y #mascarilla La #transmisión de SARS-CoV-2 en aeros…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: #ResponsabilidadSocial Insistimos con el valor de distancia social y #mascarilla La #transmisión de SARS-CoV-2 en aeros…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: #ResponsabilidadSocial Insistimos con el valor de distancia social y #mascarilla La #transmisión de SARS-CoV-2 en aeros…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: #ResponsabilidadSocial Insistimos con el valor de distancia social y #mascarilla La #transmisión de SARS-CoV-2 en aeros…
RT @RobertDDyson: @TheEconomist Read the real note: https://t.co/pFdPaQipwY
RT @RaquelBlascoR: #ResponsabilidadSocial Insistimos con el valor de distancia social y #mascarilla La #transmisión de SARS-CoV-2 en aeros…
RT @RaquelBlascoR: #ResponsabilidadSocial Insistimos con el valor de distancia social y #mascarilla La #transmisión de SARS-CoV-2 en aeros…
#ResponsabilidadSocial Insistimos con el valor de distancia social y #mascarilla La #transmisión de SARS-CoV-2 en aerosol y fomita es plausible, ya que el virus puede permanecer viable e infeccioso en aerosoles durante horas y en superficies hasta días h
@carl_carritt @cotheory @Jim_Lancashire @PaulEmbery ... But that's because it was a review paper and none reviewed looked at that. The one I was referring to (and it has many other references) was https://t.co/9Unnyo5ft3 which was specific to this virus.
RT @pesla: 13/ Hoewel niet ieder virus een reis in een klein luchtdruppeltje overleeft, blijkt dat SARS-CoV-2 er tot drie uur in kan vertoe…
RT @lmcastaldi: Quanto tempo resiste un Sars-Cov-2 sulla carta? Solo 3 ore secondo alcuni (https://t.co/RG8mYXKQWq), al 24 ore per altri (h…
RT @lmcastaldi: Quanto tempo resiste un Sars-Cov-2 sulla carta? Solo 3 ore secondo alcuni (https://t.co/RG8mYXKQWq), al 24 ore per altri (h…
RT @lmcastaldi: Quanto tempo resiste un Sars-Cov-2 sulla carta? Solo 3 ore secondo alcuni (https://t.co/RG8mYXKQWq), al 24 ore per altri (h…
RT @lmcastaldi: Quanto tempo resiste un Sars-Cov-2 sulla carta? Solo 3 ore secondo alcuni (https://t.co/RG8mYXKQWq), al 24 ore per altri (h…
Quanto tempo resiste un Sars-Cov-2 sulla carta? Solo 3 ore secondo alcuni (https://t.co/RG8mYXKQWq), al 24 ore per altri (https://t.co/5JwiyskVI6). Il Ministero della Salute ne prende atto (https://t.co/Vxfz13URMv), ma "i libri riconsegnati andranno in qua
RT @kakketoe: @harmbeertema @weijers3 @rivm Dat bewijs is er al maanden. Bij RIVM lezen ze kennelijk de vakliteratuur niet. https://t.co/QH…
@rivm @NOS @RTLnieuws @Nieuwsuur @BeauRTL #Corona #aerosolen @mauricedehond
@mauricedehond Het bewijs dat corona zich kan verspreiden tijdens superspread events is er al maanden. Bij het RIVM lezen ze kennelijk de vakliteratuur niet. Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1 | NEJM https://t.co/eQax6c
RT @kakketoe: @harmbeertema @weijers3 @rivm Dat bewijs is er al maanden. Bij RIVM lezen ze kennelijk de vakliteratuur niet. https://t.co/QH…
@harmbeertema @weijers3 @rivm Dat bewijs is er al maanden. Bij RIVM lezen ze kennelijk de vakliteratuur niet. https://t.co/QHk7igQyy8
RT @Manhattan_SWAB: Here's an actual study that shows how Coronavirus lives THE SAME AMOUNT OF TIME on plastic as on stainless steel, actua…
RT @RobertDDyson: @TheEconomist Read the real note: https://t.co/pFdPaQipwY
@MarcBonten correctie: wel geciteerd Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1. van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A, Williamson BN, et al. The New England journal of medicine. 2020. https://t.co/
@tcely The human body does not have any unknown aerosol generation mechanism equivalent to a three-jet collison nebulizer, which is what was used in the study I'm talking about. Got a citation for the study you mentioned? https://t.co/FZQJoXkHqk
Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1 | NEJM https://t.co/n5y893fxtm
Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1 | NEJM Not encouraging https://t.co/S8x2nL7051
@LionsOmega @AnastaciaR10 @SSG_PAIN @WalmartInc @Publix @Walmart @OSHA_DOL That's not true You can sneeze or cough on a surface and it does live there. You have of marginal information that you rely upon. That being said, not even the CDC is reliable. B
@cappanetti @thegr8whthunter @Its_JulieO @scrowder Here's the study referred to in the "letter": https://t.co/xA18UOFzUJ
Aerosol and Surface Stability of #COVID19 from @NEJM https://t.co/Bk4xd1mnZf
RT @RobertDDyson: @TheEconomist Read the real note: https://t.co/pFdPaQipwY
RT @riikka_kevo: Ilmalevitteisesti levinneen #SARS ja #SARSCoV2 välillä tehty vertaileva tutkimus (17.3.2020) kertoo SARSCoV2-viruksen elin…
@zerowaste_pl @MinKlimatu @asiakadziolka @filpio @PawlowskiJakub @PBarczak Jak jesteśmy przy bezpieczeństwie powierzchni, warto zaznaczyć, że wirus utrzymuje się najdłużej na plastiku - około 72h. Na miedzi 4h... Źródło dla ciekawych: https://t.co/OxFlrfA
Ilmalevitteisesti levinneen #SARS ja #SARSCoV2 välillä tehty vertaileva tutkimus (17.3.2020) kertoo SARSCoV2-viruksen eliniän olevan pitempi usealla materiaalilla kuin SARSCoV-viruksen. Aerosolmuodossa ei suuria eroja. ILMAVÄLITTEISYYS https://t.co/fa2axwU
RT @Manhattan_SWAB: Here's an actual study that shows how Coronavirus lives THE SAME AMOUNT OF TIME on plastic as on stainless steel, actua…
Here's an actual study that shows how Coronavirus lives THE SAME AMOUNT OF TIME on plastic as on stainless steel, actually a slight bit longer on plastic- Half life being approximately 5.6 hours on stainless steel and 6.8 hours on plastic. #notosingleuse
@TSealskin @bansisharma You mean me personally? I am not a scientist. But there have been multiple scientific studies proving it lingers in the air. Here is the one where they discovered SARS-2 presence in the air after 3 hours. https://t.co/8MgGkzBpUK
COVID-19' survival on surfaces was investigated and the following results were obtained: in aerosols, 3 hours; on copper surfaces, 4 hours; on cardboard surface, 24 hours; on plastic/stainless steel surface: 3 days. For more information: https://t.co/WZPT
Graag je mening: besmetting via oppervlakken. Als het niet gebeurt (@mauricedehond) hoef je ook je handen niet vaker te wassen. Als wel (link: virus 3 dagen op metaal en plastic) zouden we boodschappen moeten desinfecteren. Dus? #Corona https://t.co/7RhSE
Great paper looking at Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1 https://t.co/8gzUyoBkeZ
@NataliaLindu Salio este estudio, no se si se basarán en el. https://t.co/pPPp0rosG9
@EnferEvidente https://t.co/MUzUNtFPM5 este es un clásico, sobre todo porque salió tres días antes de cerrar Inglaterra y posterior USA! Es muy bueno, y fue el primero que afirma transmisión por gotas con duración de 30min a 3 horas! Luego salieron más..ht
@jillflanders @MASchoolsK12 @MassEarlyEdCare This is the study that prompted my proposal. FYI. Perhaps you can get those scientists to consult on improving public policy. https://t.co/8MgGkzBpUK
@musslim7 @MarkKendall_GW @TheJordanRachel You are spreading disinformation by some psychiatrist, you should be ashamed. Here is a scientific study done by actual scientists. https://t.co/8MgGkzBpUK
@pssygrbbngmom @bansisharma For a conspiracy theorist you are not doing too well. Of course CDC and WHO are sluggish at changing their protocols to reflect new research. Bureaucracy. I'm sure these American scientists will not convince you. https://t.co/8
Aerosol and surface stability of #SARSCoV2 as compared to #SARSCoV1 via New England J of Medicine #COVID19 #coronavirus https://t.co/8q9qRGSaQS
@Billpixes @tzar9ja @Ofcom So because they thought the virus can last up to 17 days on surfaces because of what happened on the cruise liner in the US and updated it after more I fo that makes it a lie. Take your own advise borrow sense. https://t.co/1k
RT @DrStephenHendry: The #SARSCoV2 virus is detectable up to 3 hours in aerosols, up to 4 hours on copper, up to 24 hours on cardboard up t…
RT @XavierAbadMdG: https://t.co/JiiPQcsFXg o bé https://t.co/7HdktPoa58. Però sí, dades directes sobre #SARSCoV2 i aigües i sorres no en te…
RT @XavierAbadMdG: https://t.co/JiiPQcsFXg o bé https://t.co/7HdktPoa58. Però sí, dades directes sobre #SARSCoV2 i aigües i sorres no en te…
RT @XavierAbadMdG: https://t.co/JiiPQcsFXg o bé https://t.co/7HdktPoa58. Però sí, dades directes sobre #SARSCoV2 i aigües i sorres no en te…
https://t.co/JiiPQcsFXg o bé https://t.co/7HdktPoa58. Però sí, dades directes sobre #SARSCoV2 i aigües i sorres no en tenim; tampoc tenim per #MERS o per #SARSCoV ni tampoc pels altres #coronavirus humans. I el 1er té la disculpa que només porta 5 mesos en
RT @JoyGreenwood: Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1 | NEJM https://t.co/SCAn2FzNXh
Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1 | NEJM https://t.co/SCAn2FzNXh
@Lonik83 @pmarsupia @Gabrielopev Pues aquí va uno: https://t.co/y3BHKhnBTB
RT @Silnobea: @LAraujo12519476 @jsanchezmartos Dr existen estudios cientificos serios que han determinado la duración del virus en distinta…
RT @JonathanBuckn13: @TheEconomist For those not wanting to have to bypass the need to subscribe. https://t.co/m7MMT1twJa This article i…
Thoughts?
RT @JonathanBuckn13: @TheEconomist For those not wanting to have to bypass the need to subscribe. https://t.co/m7MMT1twJa This article i…
@sirkamran32 @yonseokim You asked @chtnverma's favorite question so it must have been already answered to him: https://t.co/wiA0ii4ABM
RT @RobertDDyson: @TheEconomist Read the real note: https://t.co/pFdPaQipwY
@PndmcSrvvrsUSA @aetiology @SaskiaPopescu @angie_rasmussen There's a study that included covid viability on cardboard and other surfaces, and considering the fact that it lasted multiple hours on cardboard, my family chooses to play it safe by assuming it'
RT @laura_greenaura: @GreenRoc Here is one useful summary of a paper that has been influential https://t.co/Q8PVjgnydE
@GreenRoc Here is one useful summary of a paper that has been influential https://t.co/Q8PVjgnydE
RT @RobertDDyson: @TheEconomist Read the real note: https://t.co/pFdPaQipwY
@un_hombere @toniicaria @carlesenric 3. https://t.co/Gy6alL4ehO (En éste, quizá te cuesta encontrarlo, ya que hace referencia al "upper respiratory tract" y, de ahí se infiere que el contagio viene por ahí. Es decir, de las gotas que producimos)
@officialmcafee @GovWhitmer If you mean a small (tiny/micro) droplet with an acumulation of viruses - probably. But a Technical aerosol (like 1 isolated virus without attachements) probably not - I believe the hard data (like overall deathrate having LITTL
https://t.co/1QXLQxi35n Генетики: живучесть коронавируса варьируется в зависимости от поверхности https://t.co/UAtawZxWNv
RT @R34lB0rg: @neunmalelf @geraldkainz Haben wir doch. Wissenschaft ist eine Hol- und keine Bringschuld. https://t.co/UnStXiykLk https://…
Revalúen las recomendaciones de distanciamiento: aunque no confirmado se sugiere que el virus puede mantenerse hasta horas en el aire en lugares cerrados y que el solo hablar puede ser medio de contagio: https://t.co/28uyFzFgS6, https://t.co/8NbqFX8pDx
@cushmanMLB The CDC/NEJM previously said COVID could be detected on certain surfaces for 72 hours, not that it was "highly contagious" for several days on all surfaces. NEJM also said in April COVID wasn't viable on cardboard after 24 hours. Lies require
@FilGwenTygoSem Wordt niet via voorwerpen overgebracht? Zegt Maurice, die normaliter peilingen doet 🤔De dochter van onze buurman, met de bijen, Paul is een briljante dame en virologe, haar bevindingen zijn wat anders 😉 https://t.co/41HYf1roAQ artikel http
@LAraujo12519476 @jsanchezmartos Dr existen estudios cientificos serios que han determinado la duración del virus en distintas superficies https://t.co/ERKOflyHpk Aquí le dejo el enlace
@JoshMelko @DrWd40 https://t.co/SqERoIXwuf https://t.co/7jUuRTIT6H https://t.co/XLURmTLrBQ this is what we've found so far. Again thanks. (we just watched your global warming video with 73 people, hope you got some follows)
@timcarman This is a politicized lie to reopen the economy. We know very well the virus can infect cells in the lab after being on various surfaces for days — it’s been lab tested. https://t.co/10k7kfaBkq
RT @linda72135856: 1/ Coronavirus... 1 "... was more stable on plastic and stainless steel than on copper and cardboard, and viable virus w…
@yonseokim Yeah, also: https://t.co/fslrObKBuv
Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1 | NEJM https://t.co/E7EQBLM4cI
@MAM12CP Fascinating thread, thank you. Don’t know if you have seen this paper just out, which says that the virus hangs around in air in significant quantities for around 3 hours. https://t.co/wtnVITPQLk
RT @Globerunner31Uk: WRONG "SARS-CoV-2 ...was detected up to 72 hours after application to these surfaces" https://t.co/OLWMhIWNiZ Test and…
RT @Globerunner31Uk: WRONG "SARS-CoV-2 ...was detected up to 72 hours after application to these surfaces" https://t.co/OLWMhIWNiZ Test and…
Found this paper in @NEJM New England Journal of Medicine very interesting on aerosol transmission of #Covid_19 https://t.co/1usTibAE1v
@neunmalelf @geraldkainz Haben wir doch. Wissenschaft ist eine Hol- und keine Bringschuld. https://t.co/UnStXiykLk https://t.co/Oihw40446d
RT @Globerunner31Uk: WRONG "SARS-CoV-2 ...was detected up to 72 hours after application to these surfaces" https://t.co/OLWMhIWNiZ Test and…
@ArashMarkazi WRONG "SARS-CoV-2 ...was detected up to 72 hours after application to these surfaces" https://t.co/Wb6UJtBorG Test and trace study found 13 infections from 1 person on bus. One was 4.5m away. Of second influx of passengers 6 were also infecte
WRONG "SARS-CoV-2 ...was detected up to 72 hours after application to these surfaces" https://t.co/OLWMhIWNiZ Test and trace study found 13 infections from 1 person on bus. One was 4.5m away. Second influx of passengers - six were also infected. #COVIDー19