@STRAT777 @UncleJo46902375 @stkirsch Not what the study says. https://t.co/yyE3HoXzrI https://t.co/P09Of906oX
@spirit_dreamers @stopvaccinating Facts matter. Vaccines save lives. These children would be alive if they had been vaccinated. KIGGS is a proper study. The German vaccination schedule is not that different from the US. Larry spreads lies. Larry encourages
@DanielB8722 @Drmartyufml Sans vrais études, vous plaisantez, aucun vaccin n'a jamais été plus étudié Avant sa mise sur le marché une étude en double aveugle sur 43,548 patients a été publiée Cherchez vous même au lieu de répéter comme un mouton la désinf
@mrtbawss Nope. A proper scientific publication. Placebo trial? https://t.co/eyM1vyJuis Here you go. Placebo controlled RCT.
@SlyPatriot1776 @academicviews @RoblovesJC They didn’t “admit” anything, this has been their metric for efficacy. https://t.co/7Oq2GCeZAm https://t.co/JVoPuJoQY2
@plantparadise7 More deaths in the vaccine than the control for the Pfizer mRNA hack study. ❤️🩹 https://t.co/t5AvjKQEhY
RT @FrontalierFR: @Satire_Gerhard @ZDF Hier wird suggeriert, dass der Impfstoff vor Abschluss der Phase 3 bedingt zugelassen wurde. Das is…
@WhisperSpy88 @liedsuddenly @FartpantsJimmy It was the filing pathway for classification. The manufacturers call it a vaccine. It's FDA regulated within CBER, mRNA vaccines are under the Office of Vaccines Research and Review, and gene therapy is under the
@Satire_Gerhard @ZDF Hier wird suggeriert, dass der Impfstoff vor Abschluss der Phase 3 bedingt zugelassen wurde. Das ist nicht der Fall. Die Zulassung erfolgte am 21.12.2020. Die Studie zur Phase 3 wurde im November abgeschlosdrn und im Dezember publizie
@taitai78787 @MelissaMcAtee92 @TGrammie2 @chanstae You are just so shockingly stupid. all of you are. it’s exhausting. The NEJM isn’t wrong…you are. This should be obvious to any functional adult. Not you https://t.co/OpexaXMKbU
@TableCh31147808 @man_collective @mbaram Yes. Moderna: https://t.co/j4ipdNcCem https://t.co/jck0zNgcZf Pfizer: https://t.co/Yjbv5F89Za It wouldn't be hard to find the Phase 3's for Oxford/AstraZeneca or J&J.
@malou0760 @Red_Pill_Report @DoucePatrie exemple : https://t.co/ICcrKeEKb9 ILMs n'osent pas répondre... L'étude est in vitro, ca veut dire reproductible. C'est mieux que des stat et c'est dans le magasine le plus prestigieux de tous. (revu par les paires e
@organicrinella @yay_its_james Um, no they call it a vaccine. It's FDA regulated within CBER, mRNA vaccines are under the Office of Vaccines Research and Review, and gene therapy is under the Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies https://t.co/QTrHLxdVN
@deepgreendesign @IanCopeland5 https://t.co/IrwwImOVCC Excess deaths higher in vaccinated in Pfizer’s original study due to heart problems. ❤️🩹
@KasnyScience @todomejorqenada Si tan solo hubiera pasado un artículo que explica explícitamente eso... Yo ya se que no miráis lo que os paso, pero guardad las formas 😘 https://t.co/j4nTnWvxf2
@todomejorqenada @KasnyScience El texto del BMJ es del 2021 y habla de eficacia. Es por eso que busque review y artículos del 22-23 sobre eficacia y efectos adversos. Adivina que dicen. ¿Por que crees que @KasnyScience no los comenta? XD. https://t.co/hwZ
@KlausReuss @zeitonline @malte_thiessen @ewyler Phase-III-Studien sind zulassungsrelevant (Dauer: 2-5 Jahre). Brasilien ist ganz sicher ein hervorragender Ort dafür. Dennoch sind selbst gute Studien nicht geeignet, fiktive Todesraten geschweige denn ges./w
@NobodyHadToDie @stuffynz @MauritzPreller @FukArondFindOut You have already posted that. If it is your explanation as to why the clinical trials failed, then you didn't understand the question. So again, why do you think the clinical trials failed? http
@NobodyHadToDie @stuffynz @MauritzPreller @FukArondFindOut The clinical trials were not censored. I see you want to pivot onto other topics. Please stay on point. Why do you think the clinical trials fail? https://t.co/dCbkXqb03r https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPK
@NobodyHadToDie @stuffynz @MauritzPreller @FukArondFindOut Silly you, the clinical trials are not long-term. Please stay on point about your unsupported claim that the clinical trials failed. https://t.co/dCbkXqb03r Here are the clinical trials. https:/
@NobodyHadToDie @stuffynz @MauritzPreller @FukArondFindOut Nor was there a 'deadly experiment', you trying to talk about mRNA vaccines. "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive
@KasnyScience buscar articulos. Todos estos son del año 2022 o 2023, por lo que son mas recientes. El resumen es: adivina porque se almacenan a -70 ºC :D https://t.co/DEvhi29CmV yyy si, posteriores estudios han confirmado que son efectivas XD https://t.co/
@FrodeTollaksen @MarkusRdal Her er den. https://t.co/G2VXOixMCQ
@MyNoseBegins @BarryESharp @rt7683 You claimed phase 3 trials were completed after the issuance of EUA. The primary endpoints for phase 3 trials were reached in November 2020 and the EUA was issued on December 12th. You’ll note the trial results were pub
@NobodyHadToDie @stuffynz @MauritzPreller @FukArondFindOut Do you have actual evidence to support your claim that the Covid vaccines failed? The reason we know that clinical trials are robust is because of the number of documented times they don't work.
@NobodyHadToDie @stuffynz @MauritzPreller @FukArondFindOut Doesn't look like the clinical trials failed to me: "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases a
@moonchook70 @ChrisBressler7 @zap_lock @atsirkp Hi @ChrisBressler7, the data are listed in a publication at https://t.co/9yAZdFngDb. So you will need to start with reading this paper. Its open access.
@ChrisBressler7 @zap_lock @moonchook70 @atsirkp Hi @ChrisBressler7, see https://t.co/9yAZdFngDb for the data (open access).
@ChrisBressler7 @JCmacc1 @zap_lock @moonchook70 @atsirkp You must certainly love being made to look like an idiot. https://t.co/kSYJnZetF2
@ChrisBressler7 @atsirkp @moonchook70 @zap_lock Well, there’s this. Data cut-off was mid-November, but you won’t find any published work prior to this, because the primary efficacy end point hadn’t been met until then. https://t.co/mQIztHimcF
@Andre_YMKYMFOI @stkirsch @PetousisH You seem to be hell bent on perpetuating a lie that the data hasn't already been released. Please, second guess me by talking to someone you trust that works with official data who knows. Safety is a measure that was
@deannalee139541 @Pouldeau61 @TheDrJon No, I'm referring to you. If you have an actual considered basis beyond because someone said, then please share it. Otherwise, your trust is blind. Here's Pfizer's clinical trials for example, have you read and und
@BuckledPunter And what that graph does indicate is untrue. The Phase 3 trial did not show what it alleges. Please read it. https://t.co/9F6FR4NpS0
@marseille_jeff Peut-être que si la science ira contre cet avis des médias on sera contre, sur cette pandémie les médias n’ont fait que relayer une information scientifique : https://t.co/WJ8OMTdnHM
@jhondoe2509 @LockedFab La réalité scientifique: https://t.co/WJ8OMTdnHM
@Turdcat322372 @Christii3131 @nicolabruce7 @stkirsch So you are saying you can debunk peer reviewed papers when others have tried and failed. Here's a paper that others have tried to debunk, published in Dec 2020. Note that it is still published, with no
@lemire @Thoughtfulnz @alanlremick @itsajin @MauritzPreller The vaccines definitely reduced serious illness & death. Dec 2020 "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT16
@hutchy43 @DrSusanOliver1 Clinical trials published Dec 2020 didn't say the vaccine stopped transmission: "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among t
@DoppelgangBurr @Olliebeanzmom @AntiquarianMuse https://t.co/dILREEdbuF Does this work for you?
Allez, Benoit, c'est la saison, je te fais un petit cadeau. Un peu de lecture, avec quelques images. De rien. 8/10 https://t.co/jx33ya5ZCC #FranceSoirFaitDeLaMerde https://t.co/QjMa0YvGj9
@Mark50921 @cougsta https://t.co/ylHXkjZVYv This is but one of the clinical trials done before mRNA vaccines were approved. Over 43,000 people were involved. You’re welcome.
@LeaoPaulista @eboli_rodrig @filipe_rafaeli E temos que repetir que correlação nao é causalidade Os antivax nem para serem criativos e tentarem outras abordagens. Essa é antiga demais. https://t.co/sP1WEXaHrg https://t.co/z9gQSNbn90
@LeaoPaulista @filipe_rafaeli Agora leia esse artigo https://t.co/oUKgnvvFZx
@CaryDavid722 @LunaSanguinare @stuffynz @zap_lock What you say is completely unreliable, appears to be a misplaced pseudo political attempt to reject best practices. Note that the safety assurances were based on well established protocols. Some are docum
@CaryDavid722 @MauritzPreller False. "Proper testing" was competed. If you are aware of any safety steps that were rushed or skipped then please post evidence that was so. (Hint, there weren't any). Safety, including reactogenicity, is documented here:
@OldUnicornMare "the mRNA jab which was NEVER successfully trialed." The successful trial: https://t.co/mNxYOHzdmN
@CaryDavid722 @MauritzPreller Yet here it is, upheld after being challenged, correctly calculated without correction. "BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6)." https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
Yeah, yeah, you’ll throw some “study” funded by Pfizer (this was hilarious, btw) that you claim “proves” everything’s okay. https://t.co/OWPJfr7ZIR
@CaryDavid722 @MauritzPreller Wait no longer Cary! Here is the safety data, published in December 2020. https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
@OldUnicornMare @zap_lock Here's Pfizer's phase 3 trial: https://t.co/mNxYOHzdmN
@hondarekus87922 @kharaguchi https://t.co/ydOEINWFre え、出てんじゃん。 反ワクって論文すら 探せないの? その頭で医療は わからんやろなあ笑
@hondarekus87922 @noahopayoku @oyukihan1126 @hkakeya @odyssey3543 いやー、反ワクってNEJM知らない らしい。いやー、流石低学歴。 しかも、これワクチンの作用に 関する基本となる論文やなあ https://t.co/ydOEINWFre
@HerbsandDirt @Censored4sure Wrong. I have read Turtles. Moderna c19 vx RCT used saline control. But it is true most vx on the current US childhood schedule have not been tested against ‘true placebo’ since they were first tested decades ago before Google
RT @EnigmaMachine8: You're the idiot with experimental gene therapy in you ☠ 😂 I'm at ZERO risk You giving me anything is useless How fc…
You're the idiot with experimental gene therapy in you ☠ 😂 I'm at ZERO risk You giving me anything is useless How fcking stupid can you be to think I benefit from your propaganda 🤪😂😂
@EnigmaMachine8 @PhilSifu Stop bringing me shit and telling me it is gold. That document is garbage. Here is actual evidence. Try your best to read it. https://t.co/sUwtzDRBsV https://t.co/T8nOtWiPzT https://t.co/6bIA1YMqRc
@CKellyUAP This is a false interpretation of the Pfizer COVID vaccine trial. "No deaths were considered by the investigators to be related to the vaccine or placebo" per the trial" There's no evidence vaccines are causing excess mortality. https://t.co/w4
@SueGrif82239082 @yeahnaa333 @HopiNg66966500 @DrJBhattacharya @drsimonegold @ZelenkoZev @DrAseemMalhotra @DrJamesOlsson @P_McCulloughMD @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @shanejett @DonaldJTrumpJr The trials in 2020 tested efficacy and safety. They published a
@AnimalLivesMa10 Did you see someone say that and just ran with it? Pfizer was the first to complete phase 3 trials, their final results were published on December 10 2020 https://t.co/Tgeu7tbdqv
@YeahPhuck This one? https://t.co/ZSRNYAfKq1
@Riad14605925041 @humain222 @MarieBayle77 @DgCostagliola Avant d'écrire n'importe quoi on vérifie Ça évite de passer pour un imbécile. 😁 https://t.co/6Vqc4qMWqT
@vad_cliff @vocalmeister Это не так: https://t.co/wAVhrPi4A4 По крайней мере, на бумаге все было сделано. Другой вопрос, что побочки, судя по всему, скрывались, вирус мутировал и т.д.
@keith_tauber @mc_gabber Cool. Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE ht
@mc_gabber Here are some of the studies were completed before the vaccines were approved for use in Canada. https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https://t.co/C3mgIumwb5 https://t.co/FtULfFnlI1
@mc_gabber How many do you need? There's a lot. https://t.co/cL2ze3rgaz @axoplasmicgap @xeal_
@rifter741 @FormerAntivax @DrBenTapper1 Here you go, dummy. Let’s not pretend you have the skill set to critically evaluate this. https://t.co/1agMvCDbQ9
RT @pelican_parents: @VonMaunder @BobKerns @thevegdoc The safety data was published 3 years ago you dumb goon. https://t.co/1agMvCDbQ9
@VonMaunder @BobKerns @thevegdoc The safety data was published 3 years ago you dumb goon. https://t.co/1agMvCDbQ9
@MeltedJonSnow @decoder_l @InseeFr Vous avez donc vraiment 3 ans de retard en fait ? https://t.co/RweHAguJKA
@ImmortelleXIII @yves_lol @baltringos @JeanYvesCAPO @raoult_didier Voilà les essais, vous pouvez vérifier vous-même. Vous n'êtes pas qualifiée pour dire ce qu'on doit étudier dans des essais cliniques ! https://t.co/AAHvq6uyQJ
RT @PaintballWolf: @akafacehots And yet, the election was free and fair, and the mRNA vaccine was safe and effective. https://t.co/7WapoWoX…
@akafacehots And yet, the election was free and fair, and the mRNA vaccine was safe and effective. https://t.co/7WapoWoXSk https://t.co/XvpTLqLXWx
@Darla232 @Fraslin Vaccin BioNTech : 44000 personnes testées HCQ : Gautret-Raoult : 48 personnes testées, tests indépendants négatifs HCQ, Ivermectine : efficacité imaginaire ... https://t.co/kecrbWP2HG
@MRoehrbach @AGHuff The article referenced a study. Here are several others: https://t.co/PtPkggWV2c https://t.co/DWVz3jhMrx https://t.co/fGNZNQtgKn
@FrKast @ing_thegame @DominiekC @MarKes1900 @ErikCumps @BoetSchouwink @JohnnyBG19 @RoelsMaarten @RobinHoorelbeke @MarionKoopmans @SchoofsLiliane @Derevenger1 @ArnoWellens @VUamsterdam Beste @FrKast, op bijvoorbeeld https://t.co/9yAZdFmIND staat een betrouw
@MarKes1900 @FrKast @ing_thegame @Derevenger1 @DominiekC @ErikCumps @BoetSchouwink @JohnnyBG19 @RoelsMaarten @RobinHoorelbeke @MarionKoopmans @SchoofsLiliane @ArnoWellens @VUamsterdam Beste @FrKast, de wetenschap heeft nooit gesteld of beweerd of gesuggere
@XavierBazin2 Pigeon qui n'a rien vérifié https://t.co/AAHvq6uyQJ
@thehealthb0t Here's the Pfizer clinical trial, with over 40,000 participants. https://t.co/92SZq6Xx4q
@Ceylin52219293 Bak bu da benim hesap. Zamanında ne paylaşmışım. Twiti görünce aklıma geliverdi. https://t.co/8IluRGULMs
@Broken8iron @Unlikely_Buddha @DrJanKirsch Since Dec 2020, I'd be sure y'all would have more than platitudes & questions. "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the 2nd dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and
@j_avalonclinic @DrJanKirsch Some got it wrong, others were ambiguous. They based it on this from Dec 2020. "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases amo
@KeelanShatula @FactsAreGood @TheRustler83 @DrJanKirsch @Turtles54384200 Well, one of us has been fooled. "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among
@Pulpecto @JosianeReb13020 @GalvezDidier1 @NiusMarco Aucune preuve dans les conclusions à 6 mois de Pfizer que ça protège des formes graves : https://t.co/xDJLIHYHxu fig. 3, une personne dans le grp des vaccinés a fait une forme grave de la maladie; page 1
@ArrestFauxi @stkirsch @ShonadMcDermott I don’t know what you’ve been listening to, but the paper on the Pfizer P3 Covid vaccine study made it clear they used a saline placebo. Read it for yourself. https://t.co/QQ5OqUXvSN
@ShillfieldTim @rob_bristow_CA @maxfawcett It was literally tested in a double blinded placebo controlled trial. The participants were unblinded once it was proven the vaccine worked, because it would be immoral to withhold the vaccine from them after that