@Tahmin10 @drkaracenk @avogadro_sabiti @dr_phototherapy @f1rat @tipsiztibbiyeli Temmuz 2020'den Kasım 2020'ye kadar, ABD, Almanya, Türkiye, Güney Afrika, Brezilya ve Arjantin'de farklı geçmişlere sahip deneklerden oluşan çok uluslu faz 3 randomize, plasebo
@CKellyUAP I guess you're not aware of the animal trials and the clinical trials? Pfizer's clinical trial alone included over 40,000 people. I've realised that after reading a few of your posts, you never read papers, but here it is anyhow, https://t.co/92
RT @6sigmagolfrx: @phillyharper Real safe ..lol https://t.co/K0RZQORLcG
@phillyharper Real safe ..lol https://t.co/K0RZQORLcG
@KathyWilson33 @CynlandNS @ravinho07 Yes it is.
@WilliamJamesHo5 @thefoggytrail @JoshuaG19367959 @Censored4sure https://t.co/3avOEY61K9 The Pfizer vaccine was initially highly effective but this is a rapidly evolving virus unfortunately.
@TerriAbernathy4 There was plenty of evidence that they were very “good” and this remains true today… https://t.co/gmmjZEZLyq
@edmcryptodad @jamesgibbon @RealJermWarfare What’s this? https://t.co/Bhd4SUkAEe
@RawGarlicMeds No problem. Unlike you I can provide evidence to substantiate any claim I make. And I don’t even cry about it either!😂🤣 https://t.co/Bhd4SUl8tM
@ravinho07 Sure no problem. The Pfizer vaccine for Covid. https://t.co/Bhd4SUl8tM
@copelandharder 1) https://t.co/Bhd4SUl8tM 2) NNTV is a moving target and is irrelevant. All we need to know is that unvaccinated die from Covid at many times higher rates and have higher overall mortality.
Δεν καταλαβαίνει τι μου δείχνει, θέλει και τεκμηρίωση🤣🤣 https://t.co/CTupPE5Jev https://t.co/Pb1r0vxRXy https://t.co/9x17jzkynY https://t.co/vqKr1keTOp https://t.co/1TxXyXxgZT https://t.co/vGeL6XxR4r https://t.co/kFYzsHrwSb https://t.co/V4VEWiyDMv https://
@Kelly26552573 Cool. Interpret this: https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
@MPremek @ravinho07 @jasonwoody Why do y'all do this to yourselves https://t.co/mBWZSNLD57
@ONicholas74 @NOS "als je in de studies duikt valt er geregeld nogal wat af te dingen op de statische relevantie" Wat is er volgens jou op de statistische relevantie van deze studie af te dringen? https://t.co/O6CPGGiumk
@Spartan83578356 @lonnibesancon Enchantée Ahuri, quelqu'un vous avait déjà répondu : https://t.co/msT6QT8zgQ
@Spartan83578356 @BiologyAwesome @lonnibesancon https://t.co/PPh3UqsHoC Bonjour, pourquoi n'avez vous pas répondu à cette autre réponse à votre message ?
@SahabiaAli @lexquismot @agnesfirmin @aur_rousseau C'est la seule chose qu'il te reste. Comme tu dis, la preuve est faite : https://t.co/UYQ86KnBe9
@DavidSteadson @GarageRemus @thebrandybgood @Nature This is demonstrably completely false; protection against infection was the null hypothesis, as the SAE. This is now presumably checkmate. https://t.co/cKoYVpn0hu
@Spartan83578356 @lonnibesancon Décembre 2020. De rien. https://t.co/GTShkeAbM5 https://t.co/0SuCBHBCb6
@marduk_aza Here you go: https://t.co/y69ZPV8G8P Please let me know where you find issue with his study method, results and conclusion.
@tylerblack32 @brailemom For what it's worth, I was referring to symptomatic infection here: https://t.co/0MWp7am7my
@masonst321 @sjs856 It’s generally considered unethical to do placebo studies of vaccines when there’s an approved vaccine — you’d have to leave your control group unprotected. But that’s not an issue when you’re introducing a new vaccine. Quick example: h
@GrundrechteOsna @RS7212S @szahn1965 @BBarucker Und was ist das hier? https://t.co/ab7bdqR4XH https://t.co/uT9KLt5mZP
@konrad_cybulski Piśmiennictwo w kwestii szczepionek jest bardzo bogate i szeroko dostępne, znalezienie publikacji nie powinno stanowić problemu, ale proszę: https://t.co/lngf672N1j
@Moosepiss1 @gorskon @drdrew Yes, these data have been published in the same journal (NEJM) in December 2020. https://t.co/ip0IuJ2YT3 This is what I referred to, mentioning that there were 2 more casualties in the placebo arm of the study than in the vacc
@Adam_Creighton @KenPaxtonTX It would seem that you do not understand what "nucleic acid amplification–based testing" is. From the Pfizer clinical trial. https://t.co/92SZq6Xx4q https://t.co/BrjItUrFTm
@LCHF_Matt @Adam_Creighton Apparently the writer of that article is so scientifically illiterate that he doesn't know what "nucleic acid amplification–based testing" is? From the Pfizer clinical trial. https://t.co/92SZq6Xx4q https://t.co/hYAtOE9xfl
@rupisnark @USMortality That is simply not true. The Pfizer-BionTech trial was a double blinded placebo-controlled study. The placebo was a saline injection - certainly inert. Here's the paper that describes the study and its results: https://t.co/8gfUDcUJ
@Andreariva16 @Black___Adam @QLexPipiens https://t.co/ErCRB7GjOS vuoi metter l’opinione di un blogger rispetto al NEJM?
@mcfunny @LanaLuBerry @MsTrixter @doritmi when (https://t.co/TIVxd6m4k7)says "laboratory confirmed COVID 19" it is talking about PCR testing; "positive for SARS-CoV-2 by nucleic acid amplification–based testing" https://t.co/9TGUA0BBhm
@mcfunny @LanaLuBerry @MsTrixter @doritmi I'm sorry I had you muted from previously, I don't remember what happened that made me want to do that. Let's talk about 1/3 papers you linked that did mention memory cells (at all) (https://t.co/TIVxd6mC9F) , it
@mcfunny @LanaLuBerry @MsTrixter @doritmi https://t.co/Yv9sAJed7L memory cells are not mentioned at all in this one. https://t.co/TIVxd6m4k7 this one is about PCR reactogenicity (bunk) only one of the three mentions memory cells, it does not seem to expl
@Chiwee98 @kberkopes @HopiNg66966500 Provide your critical evaluation of the following, including a discussion on the robustness of the methodology & the statistical power of the data. https://t.co/YoxKwRXUvd
@FierEtLibre @karinehamelin @letulpadedavid @nicolasberrod Relisez ce que j'ai écrit avec le doigt... je crois en vs. Et lisez la phase 3 publiée en décembre 2020 🤣 https://t.co/OClC6yCxaV
@Friedri23257098 @jens_140081 @OliverFaude 22000 Verum-Probanden über 2 Monate nachverfolgt. Ende. Alles was danach kam, nennt man „Feldversuch“. https://t.co/Gs9KC5r7HU
@jomma2023EFC @LawrenceDunne3 @govt_corrupt Explain what was missed? Here’s an example 🤡 https://t.co/LPXszEVrmV
@LorbeerP @Claus_CLS @BeckerLabCRTD Gegen echtes Placebo ist nichts geprüft? Schau an, da lese ich aber hier zB anderes: https://t.co/dRWnZcfy49 https://t.co/QM6pXsVkV3
@Ant_Mazz @IanCopeland5 @LetsGoBrando45 https://t.co/N8hRg0gfJc Here you are... And now we're gonna hear your excuse...
@Megalodon_2nd @Censored4sure "Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines" https://t.co/RDOqFuljQe
@HoVincent112783 @christine_shea @paule40673239 @mogsympa On sait depuis décembre 2020 que Pfizer n'a pas testé le vaccin sur la transmission du Covid. Ce sont des laboratoires indépendants qui l'ont prouvé. Tu nous fais une belle démonstration de ton ign
@clarence8577680 @Jamesnotabot "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo" Anyone who said the vaccines eliminated transmis
@lieber_augustin @BBarucker Aha? Bist du dir da sicher oder plapperst du auch nur nach? Die Zulassungsstudie findest du hier: https://t.co/ab7bdqQx89 https://t.co/z2Jbz5rH4x
@TheGammon3 They were produced in less than a year....and you base that on what??? https://t.co/InGXoL4JOT
@forevaeva79 All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, good
RT @BHudsonWrites: @BreakingNewsFi2 @FactsAreGood @stkirsch @mongol_fi Yeah, nah. "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 da…
@Damooshiefarmer @Doctor_Eric_B The vaccines was tested on tens of thousands of people in phase 3 clinical trial before the vaccine was released to the public. https://t.co/6bIA1YLT1E
@RDhealthwealth @DudeGeorg @IanCopeland5 @drdrew @twc_health Can you point to what is missing? https://t.co/YoxKwRXmFF
@JohnKlapper6 @RumpfUrsprung ...heute ist das alles nur einen Suchbefehl entfernt. Nichts von dem was sie erzählen ist wahr. https://t.co/ptmpNIbABF
@putasycocas @BartEjea @Hondoncity Esta fue la publicación del ensayo clínico de Pfizer https://t.co/tNDO0Exzik
@Leviathan_100 @TakethatCt @liedsuddenly @The__D__Ry Pfizer: 43,448 people https://t.co/noVU8gLkJl Moderna: 30,420 people https://t.co/LIhxOCqdKO Novavax: 15,187 people in the UK, 29,582 in the US and Mexico https://t.co/Z4N7la96gg https://t.co/6E9YSACS6z
@Questio31810600 @KITTYKATcpfc This is the only link you muppet: https://t.co/GZrJDwKb3r
@KITTYKATcpfc @BreezerGalway Yes this one https://t.co/TzI6gfilDd
@mark60797576 @Ralph1Waldo @ID_Denmark Not sure I agree Mark. https://t.co/L6zDkng2zq
@Notyour28981739 Ignorance is bliss I guess. https://t.co/HbMkoaNQY8
@ShoutingThomas @VigilantNews Er. No
@SpiderCatNZ @IanCopeland5 @drdrew @twc_health Sure they did Spidey, way back in Dec 2020. Here are the clinical trials, again. https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
@Acctblty4all All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, good
@Janos_Hedgehog @Frandalmatien70 @f_philippot https://t.co/N7LnHferce Allez, courage
@P_McCulloughMD @memorialhermann @brianeharrison “No RCT has shown reductions in transmission” Pete. Please learn to read and stop lying. Are you really going to claim you’ve never seen this RCT showing a strong reduction in transmission? 👇 https://t
@AnonymousR9666 @KajensAngel @MauritzPreller @SpiderCatNZ @jacindaardern I prefer to follow the data. "A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was simil
@BreakingNewsFi2 @FactsAreGood @stkirsch @mongol_fi Yeah, nah. "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo" The efficacy wa
@ShaunRickard67 @barryjohnreid21 And do you know why there is a disconnect between the *regulation* of mRNA as a gene therapy and the *scientific* meaning of gene therapy? Here's the clinical trial for Pfizer: https://t.co/xoFGRMH44S And Moderna: https
@snugglene1 ほら、コレでも読めよ。 https://t.co/RoXFQIkWBa
@SnakeMuiBad @NotaDemoRat @JayRoadwalker Ah, so you’re admitting that calling it experimental is a lie. Good. Please provide your critical evaluation of the following then. Include discussion on the robustness of the methodology & statistical power of
@christophewyns @CampigliaStpha1 @SaiyanBio 95% d'efficacité sur les formes symptomatiques de la covid 19 https://t.co/6Vqc4qMoBl Pouvez vous affirmer que c'est faux? 🤔
@tonylinfreedom @Jadadoteth @DiedSuddenly_ https://t.co/6h0fhvz5te This is the Pfizer phase 3 trial. Please highlight where the results show higher mortality in the vaccinated group? "I bet you never read and never will". I have. And it doesn't. https:/
@TheGammon3 The mRNA vaccine platform was in development for many years. https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@TheGammon3 @big_monkeyball I'm constantly amazed at the lack of knowledge among antivaxers. The mRNA vaccine platform was in development for many years before 2020. Here's the Pfizer phase III trial, I'm sure you can find the other ones yourself. https:
@KaneTajip @Didtheearthmov1 I presume you have a citation to back that up. https://t.co/G7lDNxnop3 https://t.co/fc7g3a5Gvb
@AllenDMartin @FreedomForMD I can post this all day long. https://t.co/OpexaXNi1s
@LefunesteH @HerautPoliteia @Cian3000 @DgCostagliola Ça fait 3 ans qu'elle est sortie et il pense avoir un avis éclairé alors qu'il la découvre 🤣 https://t.co/OClC6yCxaV
@Hoodoo33 @DocDeezWhat @Alec_Zeck Ok great. Teach us dumb scientists. Provide your critical evaluation of the following. Are your concerns more focused on the robustness of the methodology or the statistical power of the data? https://t.co/YoxKwRXmFF
December 10, 2020 A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. [Note: this is RRR, not ARR] https://t.co/qZeSixOkKt
@F_Lonly19 理解できました?
RT @GiantScholarDog: こういう科学的エビデンスによって「ワクチン接種のベネフィットは副反応等のリスクを大幅に上回り、特に感染に高リスクを負う患者と多く接する医療従事者においては接種が強く推奨されるべき」という判断を得ることこそが現代医療の本質だからです。 h…
こういう科学的エビデンスによって「ワクチン接種のベネフィットは副反応等のリスクを大幅に上回り、特に感染に高リスクを負う患者と多く接する医療従事者においては接種が強く推奨されるべき」という判断を得ることこそが現代医療の本質だからです。 https://t.co/RD1rIXpWTB https://t.co/L9gcEtW5y1
@Brian13308504 @ChildrensHD Their trials were conducted in the US, Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, Germany, and Turkey. Yet this document also includes AE reports (which aren't proof of causation) from the UK, Italy, Spain, and *56 other countries*. Again
@BCBNZ @nzdsos I think I have an OIA asking them if the “Pfizer trial” participants (50ish from memory) of Polynesian origin were enough to base rolling out the jab in New Zealand. https://t.co/GyiChPCxPs https://t.co/dZVodfxsnv
@DowsonGeoff @MdBreathe yes, it was tested for efficacy https://t.co/zXpsYh4Kbf