↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Circadian Rhythms in Muscular and Osseous Physiology and Their Regulation by Nutrition and Exercise

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
19 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Circadian Rhythms in Muscular and Osseous Physiology and Their Regulation by Nutrition and Exercise
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2017.00063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinya Aoyama, Shigenobu Shibata

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Master 21 14%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 53 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 8%
Sports and Recreations 8 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 58 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,646,953
of 25,844,183 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#807
of 11,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,025
of 436,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#11
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.