The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is mushroom polysaccharide extract a better fat replacer than dried mushroom powder for food applications?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2023.1111955 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cheryl Jie Yi See Toh, Xinyan Bi, Hui Wen Lee, Michelle Ting Yun Yeo, Christiani Jeyakumar Henry |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
| Engineering | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#20,914,166
of 23,544,006 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,933
of 5,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#335,964
of 425,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#343
of 542 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,544,006 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 542 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.