↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Short-Sprint and Heavy Strength Training on Cycling Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
95 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Short-Sprint and Heavy Strength Training on Cycling Performance
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.01132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morten Kristoffersen, Øyvind Sandbakk, Bent R. Rønnestad, Hilde Gundersen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Researcher 10 6%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 52 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 74 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Unspecified 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 55 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#752,667
of 26,352,576 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#406
of 15,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,247
of 353,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#10
of 349 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,352,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 349 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.