h/t @AVastMachine, Might "impact factor", so often used to measure best science, actually undermine science? http://t.co/y2rXkFokwc …
Knowledge works: Might "impact factor", so often associated w/ marking the best science, actually undermine science? http://t.co/y2rXkFokwc
Journal ranking is bad for science http://t.co/GrTTBNLVM1
Journal ranking is bad scientific-academic practice RT @HoffmanAndy Deep impact: unintended conseqs of journal rank http://t.co/zuYaH2LOnf
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/yNTdDDG2fV
@sociolol D'ailleurs, cf aussi cet article de Brembs qui égratigne pas mal Science et consort http://t.co/ojlqqOddIx (très opposés à l'OA)
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/xKkAMvMP3l via @sharethis
@BFoenix Ma remarque précédente n'a rien de rhétorique : cf fraude scientifique en augmentation dans les revues print http://t.co/fAifWQjhsx
Hög-impact-tidskrifterna får flest "retractions" pga. behovet av säljande artiklar. Läs Brembs review i ämnet: http://t.co/6j6koHD260
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/bGiCI5zkYU
"Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank" http://t.co/PPVE4ev1jx via @sharethis
@unnombrealazar Creíble o no, aquí hay datos, no opiniones: http://t.co/yMq7ur5MkK
Es también el momento de rescatar este paper: "Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank" http://t.co/yMq7ur5MkK
@RELenski @Symbionticism it's > that: more pressure to oversell results for high IF journals - e.g. Fig 1 in http://t.co/XhYVRl6P9n
Paper saying high impact journals = more fraud. [More likely similar fraud but more scrutiny for widely read papers.] http://t.co/sVPHUKj8fS
@TrevorABranch @jebyrnes @mbeisen @brembs or, more pressure to talk up/fudge results see Fig 1 in http://t.co/XhYVRl6P9n
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank - From http://t.co/iY5axk2njp: http://t.co/5OUVE3wAjk
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal ranking http://t.co/fohjdsf45Q #seesjs
@JusticeLawDev Especially since actauly, peer-reviewed data is available: http://t.co/WQ7jx32L6B rejected by Science http://t.co/FzkieqM1DG
Well this puts the 'Science sting' in perspective: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/iQWS0lXn5l
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal ranking http://t.co/fohjdsf45Q #seesjs
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal ranking http://t.co/fohjdsf45Q #seesjs
@Dr_Aust_PhD @BoraZ See also: http://t.co/toyg8niVhV
@DrDawnEagle Indeed - and while we're at it, let's jettison the flawed notion of IF itself http://t.co/UTbGFlNjxL
This is how to do a review of journal acceptance practice http://t.co/SYQgH8WaEK
No need for "sting" operations by #Bohannon via @sciencemagazine when we already have the data http://t.co/GzeGlaKCKs by @brembs
[tag] Frontiers | Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank @brembs et al. | Frontiers in Human... http://t.co/GynYMWiiAw
Interesting analysis of the harms of judging science by impact factors. http://t.co/toyg8niVhV Pity it's in such a shit journal ;-)
Frontiers | Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience http://t.co/LvD3Wnhf4v
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/NXvc7jkuRj via @sharethis worth having a look at this paper
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/Jq8IlcPHTx via @sharethis
"Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank" http://t.co/z8YeMrVzKm
"Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank" http://t.co/z8YeMrVzKm
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/UZUaMHZz4h via @sharethis
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/1UDW86N3gk
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/yt21x4E3Zi
tineadam: RT @Toffeemen68: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/hMrDAVKlte
tineadam: RT @Toffeemen68: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/3pwWDh1flz: RT @Toffeemen68: Deep impact:...
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/1UDW86N3gk
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/1UDW86N3gk
unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/uDe4nfoFWl
Interesting article on the surge in retractions from scientific journals: http://t.co/YzPn0YBqqp
Interesting article on the surge in retractions from scientific journals: http://t.co/YzPn0YBqqp
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/2jIECNOfdD by @brembs
@JamesKilner @chrisdc77 I don't think pre-pub is a barrier to journal pub: http://t.co/xEj9RUnq1c and http://t.co/11gtdXAc0t
"In fact, it’s highly correlated with retraction rate". http://t.co/zInbSPSpEd (2/2)
"In fact, it’s highly correlated with retraction rate". http://t.co/zInbSPSpEd (2/2)
@nickwan First, I have to say I'm with @brembs that ranking jrnls is problematic and detrimental. See e.g. http://t.co/WjOSLA64Ej
"... using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice": http://t.co/llqBWOlF5r
Damning critique of the use of academic journal impact factors: http://t.co/t3w4OEKmD0
Damning critique of the use of academic journal impact factors: http://t.co/t3w4OEKmD0
Wow! 7340 full-text and PDF downloads, and only 5510 abstract views for our journal rank paper: http://t.co/WQ7jx32L6B
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/pelfolsJ68
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience http://t.co/8fD6VLqKY7
Wow! 7340 full-text and PDF downloads, and only 5510 abstract views for our journal rank paper: http://t.co/WQ7jx32L6B
Wow! 7340 full-text and PDF downloads, and only 5510 abstract views for our journal rank paper: http://t.co/WQ7jx32L6B
Wow! 7340 full-text and PDF downloads, and only 5510 abstract views for our journal rank paper: http://t.co/WQ7jx32L6B
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience http://t.co/8fD6VLqKY7
Wow! 7340 full-text and PDF downloads, and only 5510 abstract views for our journal rank paper: http://t.co/WQ7jx32L6B
@neuroconscience @sarcastic_f Agree. Deeper reform needed along these lines: http://t.co/UTbGFlNjxL. I see #prereg as a small but impt step
@BorisAdryan Flamin Nora - did they give a reason why? If it was to do with impact factor, send them this: http://t.co/XY49zM3YgQ cc @brembs
Is journal ranking bad for science? Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank #openaccess http://t.co/zdpqaK7d02
Is journal ranking bad for science? Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank #openaccess http://t.co/zdpqaK7d02
Deep impact:unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/Ig1vh630zV [Frontiers: Human Neuroscience Jun 2013] #research #methods #bias
Is the journal ranking system bad for science? A must-read paper for scientists: http://t.co/rFjHU7rfOW by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo
Interesante desacuerdo con los #journal_rank http://t.co/wbs4cfbhlf Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
Is the journal ranking system bad for science? A must-read paper for scientists: http://t.co/rFjHU7rfOW by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo
Impact Factor is like dowsing or astrology. Here's why: http://t.co/BmFm7wl74i
RT @neurobonkers Is the journal ranking system bad for science? A must-read paper for scientists: http://t.co/okoQc4nYnC by @brembs
Is the journal ranking system bad for science? A must-read paper for scientists: http://t.co/rFjHU7rfOW by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo
MT@neurobonkers: Is the journal ranking system bad for science? http://t.co/V33C0t9uIc by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo #phdchat #lovehe
Is the journal ranking system bad for science? A must-read paper for scientists: http://t.co/rFjHU7rfOW by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo
Is the journal ranking system bad for science? A must-read paper for scientists: http://t.co/rFjHU7rfOW by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo
Is the journal ranking system bad for science? A must-read paper for scientists: http://t.co/rFjHU7rfOW by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo
Interesting paper on unintended consequences of journal rankings - bad scientific practice? http://t.co/IztSQQBJKM …
Interesting paper on unintended consequences of journal rankings - bad scientific practice? http://t.co/IztSQQBJKM
Is the journal ranking system bad for science? A must-read paper for scientists: http://t.co/rFjHU7rfOW by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo
Is the journal ranking system bad for science? A must-read paper for scientists: http://t.co/rFjHU7rfOW by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo
Wow! 7340 full-text and PDF downloads, and only 5510 abstract views for our journal rank paper: http://t.co/WQ7jx32L6B
Is the journal ranking system bad for science? A must-read paper for scientists: http://t.co/rFjHU7rfOW by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo
Is the journal ranking system bad for science? A must-read paper for scientists: http://t.co/rFjHU7rfOW by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo
MT @neurobonkers: Is the journal ranking system bad for science? A must-read paper for scientists: http://t.co/A7rkZc39Zi #STEM #Research
Is the journal ranking system bad for science? A must-read paper for scientists: http://t.co/rFjHU7rfOW by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo
Is the journal ranking system bad for science? A must-read paper for scientists: http://t.co/rFjHU7rfOW by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo
Is the journal ranking system bad for science? A must-read paper for scientists: http://t.co/rFjHU7rfOW by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo
Wow! 7340 full-text and PDF downloads, and only 5510 abstract views for our journal rank paper: http://t.co/WQ7jx32L6B
Wow! 7340 full-text and PDF downloads, and only 5510 abstract views for our journal rank paper: http://t.co/WQ7jx32L6B
Today, 10k+ downloads for our paper on the lack of evidence for journal rank: http://t.co/WQ7jx32L6B
.@JamesHTweets Same. It's our job, as those who know it's wrong, to fight against such use! e.g., with: http://t.co/XY49zM3YgQ
Reading: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience http://t.co/0KhBqTgwfz #publishing #acwri
Reading: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience http://t.co/0KhBqTgwfz #publishing #acwri
Las consecuencias causadas por las clasificaciones en revistas científicas http://t.co/M128UnNynV #AJEenTuCiudad #GivingResearchAVoice
Unintended consequences of journal rank by @brembs http://t.co/KjEDUZf6Gl "abandoning journals altogether...will ultimately be necessary"
Today, 10k+ downloads for our paper on the lack of evidence for journal rank: http://t.co/WQ7jx32L6B
Today, 10k+ downloads for our paper on the lack of evidence for journal rank: http://t.co/WQ7jx32L6B
Today, 10k+ downloads for our paper on the lack of evidence for journal rank: http://t.co/WQ7jx32L6B
Today, 10k+ downloads for our paper on the lack of evidence for journal rank: http://t.co/WQ7jx32L6B
Today, 10k+ downloads for our paper on the lack of evidence for journal rank: http://t.co/WQ7jx32L6B
Today, 10k+ downloads for our paper on the lack of evidence for journal rank: http://t.co/WQ7jx32L6B