On journal ranks, retractions, decline effects and the "negotiated, irreproducible and unsound" impact factor http://t.co/AUg2BMRzk5
@nkonst4 In fact, we already know that the 'top' journals publish the least reliable science: http://t.co/jijd3E9bdd @sciencemagazine
Journal Impact factor - now that the beast is out of the cage who is going to put it back in? http://t.co/Y7tssJ0YFW
Thanks to @AVastMachine re: open access to sci pubs Deep Impact: Unintended consequences of Journal Rank http://t.co/S0Ju4h6KfF #AcadEng
Thanks to @AVastMachine re: open access to sci pubs Deep Impact: Unintended consequences of Journal Rank http://t.co/S0Ju4h6KfF #AcadEng
Thanks to @AVastMachine re: open access to sci pubs Deep Impact: Unintended consequences of Journal Rank http://t.co/S0Ju4h6KfF #AcadEng
Thanks to @AVastMachine re: open access to sci pubs Deep Impact: Unintended consequences of Journal Rank http://t.co/S0Ju4h6KfF #AcadEng
Thanks to @AVastMachine re: open access to sci pubs Deep Impact: Unintended consequences of Journal Rank http://t.co/S0Ju4h6KfF #AcadEng
Thanks to @AVastMachine re: open access to sci pubs Deep Impact: Unintended consequences of Journal Rank http://t.co/S0Ju4h6KfF #AcadEng
http://t.co/fi3gPC2bTJ @duarteoceans
http://t.co/fi3gPC2bTJ @duarteoceans
LEADERSHIP CANDIDATE THINKS IMPACT FACTOR IS A MEANINGFUL MEASURE OF PUBLICATION QUALITY! #TentacleFlail http://t.co/POmMF6tUUc
Top #evolution story: Frontiers | Deep impact: unintended consequences of journ… http://t.co/UL2EZoZWOi, see more http://t.co/vBI5qAWI96
On journal impact factor: "Given the data we surveyed above, almost anything appears superior to the status quo.” http://t.co/ebvsnyeEWb
On journal impact factor: "Given the data we surveyed above, almost anything appears superior to the status quo.” http://t.co/ebvsnyeEWb
On journal impact factor: "Given the data we surveyed above, almost anything appears superior to the status quo.” http://t.co/ebvsnyeEWb
@FrontiersIn excellent read - 'Impact Factor generates an illusion of exclusivity and prestige': http://t.co/3p0pbUXwnX
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/yYhi7BenFo
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/yYhi7BenFo
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/yYhi7BenFo
@mary_munson4 No, dangerous to the very institution of publicly funded science: http://t.co/oCauBs8XXO @SciPubLab @authorea @dhirajkumarsi16
Review on the uselessness of journal ranks, arguing in favor of library-based scholarly system instead of journals — http://t.co/KK23ULtTkA
Review on the uselessness of journal ranks, arguing in favor of library-based scholarly system instead of journals — http://t.co/KK23ULtTkA
Review on the uselessness of journal ranks, arguing in favor of library-based scholarly system instead of journals — http://t.co/KK23ULtTkA
Review on the uselessness of journal ranks, arguing in favor of library-based scholarly system instead of journals — http://t.co/KK23ULtTkA
Review on the uselessness of journal ranks, arguing in favor of library-based scholarly system instead of journals — http://t.co/KK23ULtTkA
Review on the uselessness of journal ranks, arguing in favor of library-based scholarly system instead of journals — http://t.co/KK23ULtTkA
4/4 "Deep impact: unintended consequences of #journal rank' @FrontNeurosci http://t.co/YfXnApxjaQ via @mick_tagg
RT @LianeGBenning: Using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice - a story from @FrontiersIn http://t.co/kTHhS3UUZQ
RT @LianeGBenning: Using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice - a story from @FrontiersIn http://t.co/kTHhS3UUZQ
RT @LianeGBenning: Using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice - a story from @FrontiersIn http://t.co/kTHhS3UUZQ
RT @LianeGBenning: Using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice - a story from @FrontiersIn http://t.co/XRTH9QmCOC
Interesting review of the other costs of journal selectivity http://t.co/SNGOPSv32k HT @brembs
@FrontiersIn excellent read - 'Impact Factor generates an illusion of exclusivity and prestige': http://t.co/3p0pbUXwnX
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/k1noPU70qF
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/k1noPU70qF
Using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice - a story from @FrontiersIn http://t.co/tvAejIXtZ6
Using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice - a story from @FrontiersIn http://t.co/tvAejIXtZ6
Using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice - a story from @FrontiersIn http://t.co/tvAejIXtZ6
@FrontiersIn excellent read - 'Impact Factor generates an illusion of exclusivity and prestige': http://t.co/3p0pbUXwnX
@FrontiersIn excellent read - 'Impact Factor generates an illusion of exclusivity and prestige': http://t.co/3p0pbUXwnX
Using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice - a story from @FrontiersIn http://t.co/tvAejIXtZ6
Using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice - a story from @FrontiersIn http://t.co/tvAejIXtZ6
Using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice - a story from @FrontiersIn http://t.co/tvAejIXtZ6
@FrontiersIn excellent read - 'Impact Factor generates an illusion of exclusivity and prestige': http://t.co/3p0pbUXwnX
@FrontiersIn excellent read - 'Impact Factor generates an illusion of exclusivity and prestige': http://t.co/3p0pbUXwnX
@FrontiersIn excellent read - 'Impact Factor generates an illusion of exclusivity and prestige': http://t.co/3p0pbUXwnX
@FrontiersIn excellent read - 'Impact Factor generates an illusion of exclusivity and prestige': http://t.co/3p0pbUXwnX
@FrontiersIn excellent read - 'Impact Factor generates an illusion of exclusivity and prestige': http://t.co/3p0pbUXwnX
@FrontiersIn excellent read - 'Impact Factor generates an illusion of exclusivity and prestige': http://t.co/3p0pbUXwnX
@FrontiersIn excellent read - 'Impact Factor generates an illusion of exclusivity and prestige': http://t.co/3p0pbUXwnX
Interesting review of the other costs of journal selectivity http://t.co/SNGOPSv32k HT @brembs
@FrontiersIn excellent read - 'Impact Factor generates an illusion of exclusivity and prestige': http://t.co/3p0pbUXwnX
Interesting review of the other costs of journal selectivity http://t.co/SNGOPSv32k HT @brembs
Interesting review of the other costs of journal selectivity http://t.co/SNGOPSv32k HT @brembs
Interesting review of the other costs of journal selectivity http://t.co/SNGOPSv32k HT @brembs
Alternatives? Scholarly "journal rank is expensive, delays science and frustrates researchers" conclude @brembs et al http://t.co/dAdCsDAxvD
"using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice" #science #study http://t.co/TQROkAR179
Interesting article about why using journal rank (impact factor) as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice: http://t.co/J0HfgJWK2N
Interesting article about why using journal rank (impact factor) as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice: http://t.co/J0HfgJWK2N
Interesting article about why using journal rank (impact factor) as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice: http://t.co/J0HfgJWK2N
unintended consequences of journal rank #alm #scholarlycommunication #interoperability #universitypresses http://t.co/wI7VmP8Xut
unintended consequences of journal rank #alm #scholarlycommunication #interoperability #universitypresses http://t.co/wI7VmP8Xut
@ShehnilaZardari @drfeldt I also highly recommend this article, on the low quality in high IF journals: http://t.co/N2v2m5OMCZ
@ShehnilaZardari @drfeldt I also highly recommend this article, on the low quality in high IF journals: http://t.co/N2v2m5OMCZ
@notSoJunkDNA Reference: http://t.co/ZoqVqQm0dA Reviewed in: http://t.co/oCauBs8XXO @pedrobeltrao @neilfws
Essential read for all scientists: relationship of impact factor with quality & retractions @JanneSeppanen @brembs http://t.co/Lz849iYUOx
More Mergers? We need a fundamental reform! @brembs et al suggest abandoning journals will ultimately be necessary. http://t.co/aFitXywpM8
Essential read for all scientists: relationship of impact factor with quality & retractions @JanneSeppanen @brembs http://t.co/Lz849iYUOx
Deep impact: An interesting study of unintended consequences of journal rank by Björn @Brembs - discuss @Science_Open http://t.co/oGvtdlv5wH
Deep impact: An interesting study of unintended consequences of journal rank by Björn @Brembs - discuss @Science_Open http://t.co/oGvtdlv5wH
Deep impact: An interesting study of unintended consequences of journal rank by Björn @Brembs - discuss @Science_Open http://t.co/oGvtdlv5wH
Deep impact: An interesting study of unintended consequences of journal rank by Björn @Brembs - discuss @Science_Open http://t.co/oGvtdlv5wH
Deep impact: An interesting study of unintended consequences of journal rank by Björn @Brembs - discuss @Science_Open http://t.co/oGvtdlv5wH
Deep impact: An interesting study of unintended consequences of journal rank by Björn @Brembs - discuss @Science_Open http://t.co/oGvtdlv5wH
Deep impact: An interesting study of unintended consequences of journal rank by Björn @Brembs - discuss @Science_Open http://t.co/oGvtdlv5wH
Deep impact: An interesting study of unintended consequences of journal rank by Björn @Brembs - discuss @Science_Open http://t.co/oGvtdlv5wH
Deep impact: An interesting study of unintended consequences of journal rank by Björn @Brembs - discuss @Science_Open http://t.co/oGvtdlv5wH
@sampendu @lakens @RolfZwaan @rogierK Doing away with journals altogether would kill many birds http://t.co/rvSEW2rTEE
Using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice" http://t.co/AXQtIcwm0I
Impact Factor—Negotiated, Irreproducible, and Unsound http://t.co/rAqtd4mhYI
Impact Factor—Negotiated, Irreproducible, and Unsound http://t.co/rAqtd4mhYI
Impact Factor—Negotiated, Irreproducible, and Unsound http://t.co/rAqtd4mhYI
Impact Factor—Negotiated, Irreproducible, and Unsound http://t.co/rAqtd4mhYI
@PhilPurnell @curtrice @friendlymicrobe @michelleoyen @AchilleasK Any data of the sort we review in our paper: http://t.co/oCauBs8XXO
@ResearchUGent @paulwouters @ugent and this one too :) http://t.co/H5BOsmQLc5
Too many institutions are worshipping #ImpactFactor Read @brembs review http://t.co/n52TwSBsvs -- @emckiernan13 #OAAmbs
Too many institutions are worshipping #ImpactFactor Read @brembs review http://t.co/n52TwSBsvs -- @emckiernan13 #OAAmbs
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/cm05nrlOOD
Evidence: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/M0ZmrWO8RP via @brembs (follow him btw) #opencon2014
Evidence: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/M0ZmrWO8RP via @brembs (follow him btw) #opencon2014
Evidence: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/M0ZmrWO8RP via @brembs (follow him btw) #opencon2014
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
Evidence: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/M0ZmrWO8RP via @brembs (follow him btw) #opencon2014
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
Evidence: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/M0ZmrWO8RP via @brembs (follow him btw) #opencon2014
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”