論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
Evidence: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/M0ZmrWO8RP via @brembs (follow him btw) #opencon2014
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
Evidence: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/M0ZmrWO8RP via @brembs (follow him btw) #opencon2014
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
Evidence: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/M0ZmrWO8RP via @brembs (follow him btw) #opencon2014
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
Evidence: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/M0ZmrWO8RP via @brembs (follow him btw) #opencon2014
Evidence: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/M0ZmrWO8RP via @brembs (follow him btw) #opencon2014
Evidence: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/M0ZmrWO8RP via @brembs (follow him btw) #opencon2014
Evidence: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/M0ZmrWO8RP via @brembs (follow him btw) #opencon2014
Evidence: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/M0ZmrWO8RP via @brembs (follow him btw) #opencon2014
@JimJohnsonSci Well, some data seem to suggest otherwise, cited here: http://t.co/4AnYSYJfEx (para before "alternatives") @emckiernan13
@geoffreyyork Do you think it could have something to do with the pattern of #scientific #retractions? http://t.co/vPPx0uNyyy
Reminded of another excellent piece by :@brembs et al. Unintended onsequences of journal rank http://t.co/ioGYOQzXhl
Reminded of another excellent piece by :@brembs et al. Unintended onsequences of journal rank http://t.co/ioGYOQzXhl
Reminded of another excellent piece by :@brembs et al. Unintended onsequences of journal rank http://t.co/ioGYOQzXhl
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/vuuQvGEQYW
Bjorn Brembs discussed this here: http://t.co/FTOK8WmxGT And also shows that IF *is* correlated with retraction rate.
Bjorn Brembs discussed this here: http://t.co/FTOK8WmxGT And also shows that IF *is* correlated with retraction rate.
Bjorn Brembs discussed this here: http://t.co/FTOK8WmxGT And also shows that IF *is* correlated with retraction rate.
Bjorn Brembs discussed this here: http://t.co/FTOK8WmxGT And also shows that IF *is* correlated with retraction rate.
Bjorn Brembs discussed this here: http://t.co/FTOK8WmxGT And also shows that IF *is* correlated with retraction rate.
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank - makes for interesting reading. http://t.co/FceNY5EKdz
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank - makes for interesting reading. http://t.co/FceNY5EKdz
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank - makes for interesting reading. http://t.co/FceNY5EKdz
"we can use current technology and remove the need for a journal hierarchy completely" http://t.co/Ck5AYrLDhI
Beautiful paper: "Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank" Thanks @brembs http://t.co/Ck5AYrLDhI
@TrevorABranch Besides, that's cherry picking anyway. Look at the data http://t.co/calFiJrgFL
@GrahamCLDavey @Richard56 Indeed, how did you know? :-) http://t.co/4AnYSYJfEx
This paper heavily criticizes #ImpactFactor and thereby got one of the highest #Altmetric scores ever! http://t.co/qRBzCX8z4D
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience http://t.co/BFqiMCKv2m
Really interesting article on journal quality, publication bias, scientific fraud and the future of publishing: http://t.co/dYmuJgMBm9
More on alternative ideas for impact eval http://t.co/OFuuUMY7n5
Reminder today of the deep negative consequences of using impact factors http://t.co/4b5TMGjINt via @brembs, @MarcusMunafo & @FrontiersIn
Reminder today of the deep negative consequences of using impact factors http://t.co/4b5TMGjINt via @brembs, @MarcusMunafo & @FrontiersIn
Reminder today of the deep negative consequences of using impact factors http://t.co/4b5TMGjINt via @brembs, @MarcusMunafo & @FrontiersIn
Reminder today of the deep negative consequences of using impact factors http://t.co/4b5TMGjINt via @brembs, @MarcusMunafo & @FrontiersIn
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. http://t.co/t8ZScvr4Cc
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. http://t.co/t8ZScvr4Cc
@Metoeken @ReskiLab @lab_robot @c_s_hardtke @helmholtz_de Reference for previous tweet: http://t.co/n4pXXIXP20
As in every year, ThomsonReuters will publish 2013's Journal Impact Factors soon. And as in every year, this will... http://t.co/3gkloxQcvw
The usual "big journals are bullies [though perhaps unintended]" rant ... only this time with some interesting data: http://t.co/bNWapJQqwp
@1amnerd more on @brembs blog http://t.co/l6HWvk6Iyl Read his paper too http://t.co/7NWWKea3bj
"data corroborate previous hypotheses: using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice." http://t.co/ZNEcel97NU @brembs
"Using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice", study by @brembs et al. http://t.co/ABwmH3Rhpp
"Using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice", study by @brembs et al. http://t.co/ABwmH3Rhpp
“@BlueSpotScience: Suggestion 2 abandon journals altogether, in favor of library-based communicatn http://t.co/MHFzLdtuiv” @leighblackall
Suggestion to abandon journals altogether, in favor of library-based scholarly communication http://t.co/5hWtBaPMKQ
Higher ranking journals are more likely to publish fraudulent work http://t.co/MyfS96uDpg
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/hYKOk3xt2g
"using journal rank is unhelpful at best and unscientific at worst" http://t.co/tEeEekt7OJ
Journal rankings - worth it? Unintended consequences of journal ranking http://t.co/b6ICziEsRn
Unintended consequences of journal rank #FoodForThought http://t.co/88XipSzLmv
Frontiers | Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | F... via @Inboundorg http://t.co/kMEPwqjQYW #science #scientificmethod
Frontiers | Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | F... via @Inboundorg http://t.co/m15GUZmrQ8 #science #scientificmethod
No surprise > writing for "journal rank" has negative effect. I know writing for your readers never does. http://t.co/D5mGr0LAYb #publishing
Frontiers | Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience http://t.co/0cwGyAAC7q #SEO www.zing...
Frontiers | Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience http://t.co/SJ8eDvt2nC #SEO www.zing...
Frontiers | Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience http://t.co/0cwGyAAC7q #SEO www.zing...
Frontiers | Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience http://t.co/SJ8eDvt2nC #SEO www.zing...
Like homeopathy, journal rank appeals to subjective impression of effects, these disappear with scientific scrutiny http://t.co/sj22SKRmt1
Higher ranking journals are more likely to publish fraudulent work http://t.co/MyfS96uDpg
Like homeopathy, journal rank appeals to subjective impression of effects, these disappear with scientific scrutiny http://t.co/sj22SKRmt1
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank... http://t.co/a6Fq9BdYt2
Study shows that higher ranking journals don't produce 'better' science http://t.co/mJly0zc5VO #onthecontrary via @ycombinator
Really interesting article on journal quality, publication bias, scientific fraud and the future of publishing: http://t.co/dYmuJgMBm9
Higher ranking journals are more likely to publish fraudulent work http://t.co/MyfS96uDpg
Higher ranking journals are more likely to publish fraudulent work http://t.co/MyfS96uDpg
Study shows that higher ranking journals don't produce 'better' science http://t.co/mJly0zc5VO #onthecontrary via @ycombinator
Like homeopathy, journal rank appeals to subjective impression of effects, these disappear with scientific scrutiny http://t.co/sj22SKRmt1
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/ULsDCCwd43 via #hackernews
"Using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice" http://t.co/8H9fdgQK28
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank... http://t.co/a6Fq9BdYt2
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank... http://t.co/a6Fq9BdYt2
Words to live by "Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank" http://t.co/6PAJmtBb5i
Words to live by "Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank" http://t.co/6PAJmtBb5i
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/mUQg7OPhDt
Frontiers | Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience via @delicious http://t.co/VMjF10r1GA
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/UTG6x6zRPM Comments from Hacker News http://t.co/KNbLVRybsO via IFTTT
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/5Xo6gxhU2b http://t.co/I52kOyNwdR
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/4JcGksODma
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/nlMWb5mE9R
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/g9mgmakrkX
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank - http://t.co/0BWgnquRty
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/y8J42wH09k
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/IG9Ri9oPtx (cmts http://t.co/BLraEVverg)
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/kYj0rkcREi
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | http://t.co/goAHmsAEH6 #geeknews via ycombinator
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank: http://t.co/GwZbwemyVK Comments: https://t.co/ZsoB9zlZPw