RT @brembs: Data by others show that jrnls like @nejm publish unreliable science: https://t.co/mOpDgvDoXQ #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.c…
RT @MedThinkSciCom: The unintended consequences of #journalrank https://t.co/1dCyKJ8vmm
RT @danbolser: We suggest that abandoning journals altogether, in favor of a library-based scholarly communication system. FINALLY https:/…
RT @danbolser: We suggest that abandoning journals altogether, in favor of a library-based scholarly communication system. FINALLY https:/…
RT @danbolser: We suggest that abandoning journals altogether, in favor of a library-based scholarly communication system. FINALLY https:/…
RT @danbolser: We suggest that abandoning journals altogether, in favor of a library-based scholarly communication system. FINALLY https:/…
The unintended consequences of #journalrank https://t.co/1dCyKJ8vmm
RT @brembs: Data by others show that jrnls like @nejm publish unreliable science: https://t.co/mOpDgvDoXQ #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.c…
RT @brembs: @portlandpress References to this and many more such data here: https://t.co/kQQ9WjxgfX paper: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd
RT @brembs: Data by others show that jrnls like @nejm publish unreliable science: https://t.co/mOpDgvDoXQ #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.c…
We suggest that abandoning journals altogether, in favor of a library-based scholarly communication system. FINALLY https://t.co/bkVFDiX8hF
RT @brembs: Data by others show that jrnls like @nejm publish unreliable science: https://t.co/mOpDgvDoXQ #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.c…
RT @brembs: Data by others show that jrnls like @nejm publish unreliable science: https://t.co/mOpDgvDoXQ #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.c…
RT @jamimmunology: Once again, scientists scientifically show that scientists judge each other's work by non scientific criteria https://t.…
RT @jamimmunology: Once again, scientists scientifically show that scientists judge each other's work by non scientific criteria https://t.…
Once again, scientists scientifically show that scientists judge each other's work by non scientific criteria https://t.co/UKAFYviH6Y
The harms of Scientific Journals and Impact Factor -- is it time to publish science elsewhere?... https://t.co/fSzQZ70QwY
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/ByXIvMD4oa
RT @Matthijs85: Deep impact: How journal ranking negatively affects scientific quality https://t.co/7I7wHCrWxv #science #ranking https://t.…
Frontiers | Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal #rank | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience https://t.co/AG6NRN8gea
RT @brembs: @Protohedgehog Neuroscience studies, Fig. 2: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd
Deep impact: How journal ranking negatively affects scientific quality https://t.co/7I7wHCrWxv #science #ranking https://t.co/4KXKx9j0fg
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/JPEfvPPQRL
From https://t.co/W9G6rwkwwD (also via @brembs )
RT @brembs: @Neuro_Skeptic @sampendu @dalejbarr Exactly. Those were neuro studies. Fig. 1 here: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd
RT @brembs: @hansijzerman @Neuro_Skeptic Yes, neuroscience studies, fig. 2 here: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd
Unintended consequences of journal rank by @brembs et al. https://t.co/kguS55ehH8 HT @Protohedgehog cc @akosavic #OA https://t.co/NiL29JjqsD
RT @brembs: @Protohedgehog Neuroscience studies, Fig. 2: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd
RT @eachus: @MorningWXGuythe @MrLucassen @Freeman1899 @tan123 BTW: https://t.co/US9ZBZJ7r4 High journal rankings actually correlate to b…
RT @eachus: @MorningWXGuythe @MrLucassen @Freeman1899 @tan123 BTW: https://t.co/US9ZBZJ7r4 High journal rankings actually correlate to b…
@MorningWXGuythe @MrLucassen @Freeman1899 @tan123 BTW: https://t.co/US9ZBZJ7r4 High journal rankings actually correlate to bad science.
#peerreview Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/mh8biRXvxp
RT @FrontiersIn: See the paper "Deep Impact" by @brembs in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (>95K views!) https://t.co/V1IZa0I6HJ https://t.…
RT @FrontiersIn: See the paper "Deep Impact" by @brembs in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (>95K views!) https://t.co/V1IZa0I6HJ https://t.…
RT @FrontiersIn: See the paper "Deep Impact" by @brembs in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (>95K views!) https://t.co/V1IZa0I6HJ https://t.…
RT @FrontiersIn: See the paper "Deep Impact" by @brembs in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (>95K views!) https://t.co/V1IZa0I6HJ https://t.…
See the paper "Deep Impact" by @brembs in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (>95K views!) https://t.co/V1IZa0I6HJ https://t.co/kAxI80im9N
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience https://t.co/PHZVFnPBfG
“Abandoning journals…, in favor of a library-based scholarly communication system, will ultimately be necessary.” https://t.co/M04CkZmpug
RT @brembs: @aemonten Tell them it's one of the root causes of the replication crisis: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd
Publications in high ranking journals, not only more likely to be fraudulent but also more likely to be unreliable https://t.co/WsIjLJ7wEi
RT @brembs: See this for a scholarly review of current data: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd (links to more recent papers in a comment) https://t.c…
RT @brembs: See this for a scholarly review of current data: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd (links to more recent papers in a comment) https://t.c…
RT @aemonten: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/e88gdmwWBm
RT @aemonten: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/e88gdmwWBm
RT @aemonten: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/e88gdmwWBm
♻ @demartin: “using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice” https://t.co/nSOqsl35w8 ht @albertobaccini
RT @demartin: “using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice.” https://t.co/VWa54hCbGK ht @albertobaccini cc @Aisa_OA
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/e88gdmwWBm
RT @HannahGilman1: Don't judge a book by its cover? How about don't judge the quality of research by its journals impact factor https://t.c…
Don't judge a book by its cover? How about don't judge the quality of research by its journals impact factor https://t.co/SCxaQhtGir
“using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice.” https://t.co/VWa54hCbGK ht @albertobaccini cc @Aisa_OA
RT @Protohedgehog: Some useful papers on this via @johnhawks: Why using journal rank (or impact factor) sucks https://t.co/4xMeNIOIxi by @b…
Some useful papers on this via @johnhawks: Why using journal rank (or impact factor) sucks https://t.co/4xMeNIOIxi by @brembs @MarcusMunafo
A few of many papers arguing journal impact factors are unreliable: https://t.co/CDYMJzW560 https://t.co/FLC3H1w5UJ https://t.co/P9TruS82WR
@j2bryson @RebeccaSear Yes, you're right! See Fig. 1D here for example https://t.co/UGn3xXjL0N via @brembs
@some_wise higher unreliability, too! https://t.co/MxmMcNog8i @mbeisen
RT @brembs: @JopieNet JIF means something: high-JIF journals publish significantly more unreliable research: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd
RT @brembs: @KennethRuud Wonder what value authors would assign to the journals publishing the least reliable science? https://t.co/MG4MgZ1…
Journal impact factor is a better predictor of unreliable research than of individual papers' citations: https://t.co/mkbmb37SgR
! RT @brembs: Wow! Is the @ERC_Research striving to exacerbate the #replicability crisis? https://t.co/bSymiExMGH https://t.co/tkRG2tRJRQ
RT @brembs: Looks like ERC is set to make the #replicability crisis worse by funding unreliable science: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd https://t.…
RT @brembs: Wow! Is the @ERC_Research striving to exacerbate the #replicability crisis? https://t.co/dv9R4pf1de https://t.co/FxFB6K11jy
RT @brembs: Looks like ERC is set to make the #replicability crisis worse by funding unreliable science: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd https://t.…
RT @brembs: Looks like ERC is set to make the #replicability crisis worse by funding unreliable science: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd https://t.…
RT @brembs: Wow! Is the @ERC_Research striving to exacerbate the #replicability crisis? https://t.co/dv9R4pf1de https://t.co/FxFB6K11jy
RT @brembs: Looks like ERC is set to make the #replicability crisis worse by funding unreliable science: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd https://t.…
RT @brembs: Looks like ERC is set to make the #replicability crisis worse by funding unreliable science: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd https://t.…
RT @brembs: Looks like ERC is set to make the #replicability crisis worse by funding unreliable science: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd https://t.…
RT @brembs: Looks like ERC is set to make the #replicability crisis worse by funding unreliable science: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd https://t.…
RT @brembs: Looks like ERC is set to make the #replicability crisis worse by funding unreliable science: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd https://t.…
RT @brembs: Looks like ERC is set to make the #replicability crisis worse by funding unreliable science: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd https://t.…
RT @Protohedgehog: Study by @brembs again mentioned at #opencon: the only thing the impact factor correlates with is retraction rate https:…
RT @Protohedgehog: Study by @brembs again mentioned at #opencon: the only thing the impact factor correlates with is retraction rate https:…
RT @Protohedgehog: Study by @brembs again mentioned at #opencon: the only thing the impact factor correlates with is retraction rate https:…
RT @Protohedgehog: Study by @brembs again mentioned at #opencon: the only thing the impact factor correlates with is retraction rate https:…
RT @Protohedgehog: Study by @brembs again mentioned at #opencon: the only thing the impact factor correlates with is retraction rate https:…
RT @Protohedgehog: Study by @brembs again mentioned at #opencon: the only thing the impact factor correlates with is retraction rate https:…
RT @Protohedgehog: Study by @brembs again mentioned at #opencon: the only thing the impact factor correlates with is retraction rate https:…
'using journal rank as evaluation tool is bad science' #openaccess #IF https://t.co/soYxcw44HT
RT @Protohedgehog: Study by @brembs again mentioned at #opencon: the only thing the impact factor correlates with is retraction rate https:…
RT @Protohedgehog: Study by @brembs again mentioned at #opencon: the only thing the impact factor correlates with is retraction rate https:…
RT @Protohedgehog: Study by @brembs again mentioned at #opencon: the only thing the impact factor correlates with is retraction rate https:…
RT @Protohedgehog: Study by @brembs again mentioned at #opencon: the only thing the impact factor correlates with is retraction rate https:…
RT @Protohedgehog: Study by @brembs again mentioned at #opencon: the only thing the impact factor correlates with is retraction rate https:…
RT @Protohedgehog: Study by @brembs again mentioned at #opencon: the only thing the impact factor correlates with is retraction rate https:…
RT @Protohedgehog: Study by @brembs again mentioned at #opencon: the only thing the impact factor correlates with is retraction rate https:…
RT @Protohedgehog: Study by @brembs again mentioned at #opencon: the only thing the impact factor correlates with is retraction rate https:…
Study by @brembs again mentioned at #opencon: the only thing the impact factor correlates with is retraction rate https://t.co/4xMeNIOIxi
RT @brembs: @adamcchang Hmm, one start could be this paper: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd also maybe: https://t.co/WefCqtvyab @mbeisen @graysouth…
RT @dhuerlimann: Impact Factor—Negotiated, Irreproducible, and Unsound. Paper and talk by @brembs at #opencon https://t.co/5yELeI0o4v https…
RT @brembs: @adamcchang Hmm, one start could be this paper: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd also maybe: https://t.co/WefCqtvyab @mbeisen @graysouth…
RT @MikeTaylor: Just saw @brembs' article Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank has been read 90,997 times! #OpenCon https:/…
RT @MikeTaylor: Just saw @brembs' article Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank has been read 90,997 times! #OpenCon https:/…
#opencon Academe misuse of rankings at heart of bad science & unethical behavior of researchers: https://t.co/KWk1vu01HY
RT @MikeTaylor: Just saw @brembs' article Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank has been read 90,997 times! #OpenCon https:/…
RT @MikeTaylor: Just saw @brembs' article Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank has been read 90,997 times! #OpenCon https:/…
RT @MikeTaylor: Just saw @brembs' article Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank has been read 90,997 times! #OpenCon https:/…