RT @MikeTaylor: Just saw @brembs' article Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank has been read 90,997 times! #OpenCon https:/…
Just saw @brembs' article Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank has been read 90,997 times! #OpenCon https://t.co/NKKS6uCV3B
RT @emckiernan13: Hey #opencon folks, here's the awesome paper from @brembs on impact factor https://t.co/iKVGkMbesh
RT @dhuerlimann: Impact Factor—Negotiated, Irreproducible, and Unsound. Paper and talk by @brembs at #opencon https://t.co/5yELeI0o4v https…
RT @emckiernan13: Hey #opencon folks, here's the awesome paper from @brembs on impact factor https://t.co/iKVGkMbesh
RT @dhuerlimann: Impact Factor—Negotiated, Irreproducible, and Unsound. Paper and talk by @brembs at #opencon https://t.co/5yELeI0o4v https…
@MikeTaylor @sharmanedit @brembs's own paper makes some reference to this https://t.co/7Wg1KwT9OM
RT @emckiernan13: Hey #opencon folks, here's the awesome paper from @brembs on impact factor https://t.co/iKVGkMbesh
RT @dhuerlimann: Impact Factor—Negotiated, Irreproducible, and Unsound. Paper and talk by @brembs at #opencon https://t.co/5yELeI0o4v https…
RT @emckiernan13: Hey #opencon folks, here's the awesome paper from @brembs on impact factor https://t.co/iKVGkMbesh
RT @emckiernan13: Hey #opencon folks, here's the awesome paper from @brembs on impact factor https://t.co/iKVGkMbesh
RT @dhuerlimann: Impact Factor—Negotiated, Irreproducible, and Unsound. Paper and talk by @brembs at #opencon https://t.co/5yELeI0o4v https…
RT @HackYourPhd: RT @emckiernan13 Hey #opencon folks, here's the awesome paper from @brembs on impact factor https://t.co/37pBnOmSm0 cc @…
Impact Factor—Negotiated, Irreproducible, and Unsound. Paper and talk by @brembs at #opencon https://t.co/5yELeI0o4v https://t.co/MZQJiz875f
RT @HackYourPhd: RT @emckiernan13 Hey #opencon folks, here's the awesome paper from @brembs on impact factor https://t.co/37pBnOmSm0 cc @…
RT @emckiernan13: Hey #opencon folks, here's the awesome paper from @brembs on impact factor https://t.co/iKVGkMbesh
RT @emckiernan13: Hey #opencon folks, here's the awesome paper from @brembs on impact factor https://t.co/iKVGkMbesh
RT @emckiernan13 Hey #opencon folks, here's the awesome paper from @brembs on impact factor https://t.co/37pBnOmSm0 cc @introspection
RT @iaravps: Artigo de @brembs sobre os problemas do Fator de Impacto https://t.co/I7sXgHrYEG #opencon #twitciencia
RT @emckiernan13: Hey #opencon folks, here's the awesome paper from @brembs on impact factor https://t.co/iKVGkMbesh
Hey #opencon folks, here's the awesome paper from @brembs on impact factor https://t.co/iKVGkMbesh
RT @brembs: @StuartBuck1 Better or decent? Throwing dice is already better than #impactfactor: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd @mbeisen @ekansa @ew…
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/3y0FTWrTPP
RT @brembs: @cebinha references see, e.g.: https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd and https://t.co/9D0ffUqGdO and references therein
RT @MikeTaylor: @i_rockhopper @realscientists It's not EVEN high-IF publication: they issue disproportionately MANY retractions. https://t.…
RT @MikeTaylor: @i_rockhopper @realscientists It's not EVEN high-IF publication: they issue disproportionately MANY retractions. https://t.…
@i_rockhopper @realscientists It's not EVEN high-IF publication: they issue disproportionately MANY retractions. https://t.co/43LKKD7LP7
RT @brembs: @mattdotvaughn Could be one historical factor among several sociological factors: http://t.co/jijd3E9bdd @openscience
RT @lupicinio: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/pWe6boqTfY #openaccess #scientificimpact http://t.co/r3XQl…
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/pWe6boqTfY #openaccess #scientificimpact http://t.co/r3XQlOB9Oo
RT @brembs: @ReskiLab Not a brave statement, just a recount of the data: http://t.co/jijd3E9bdd Nobody is entitled to their own facts...
RT @QuadernsPsico: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/PGck9QMWwB #openaccess #scientificimpact
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/9od24LnDls #openaccess #scientificimpact
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/PGck9QMWwB #openaccess #scientificimpact
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/pWe6boIuEy #openaccess #scientificimpact
@BrettButtliere Sure, or a library based one. I like SciElo too. http://t.co/TW8L7zMZBS
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/X3Rvd56Bd1
RT @fsteeg: "abandoning journals altogether, [for] a library-based scholarly communication system, will ultimately be necessary" http://t.c…
"abandoning journals altogether, [for] a library-based scholarly communication system, will ultimately be necessary" http://t.co/PDfXhUZxT0
@SciPubLab @OATage @altmetric @Stew @petergrabitz says JIF is not transparent cause one can negotiate it! http://t.co/5BHqIWjFfY
@PlantEvolution Specially when we have cool evidence e.g. http://t.co/XCwHYcZSCu … by @brembs
RT @hiig_berlin: @lambo empfiehlt @brembs Paper "Deep Impact" http://t.co/TDoJTFgXBF #wmdesalon
RT @hiig_berlin: @lambo empfiehlt @brembs Paper "Deep Impact" http://t.co/TDoJTFgXBF #wmdesalon
@lambo empfiehlt @brembs Paper "Deep Impact" http://t.co/TDoJTFgXBF #wmdesalon
RT @sr120: I like this: "abandoning journals altogether, in favor of a library-based scholarly communication system" http://t.co/W7cz07jJOt
RT @brembs: @Andrew84Kelly IF is not really 'calculated' at all: negotiation range between 0.5 and 25. http://t.co/jijd3E9bdd @SciPubLab @p…
RT @brembs: @Andrew84Kelly IF is not really 'calculated' at all: negotiation range between 0.5 and 25. http://t.co/jijd3E9bdd @SciPubLab @p…
RT @sr120: I like this: "abandoning journals altogether, in favor of a library-based scholarly communication system" http://t.co/W7cz07jJOt
I like this: "abandoning journals altogether, in favor of a library-based scholarly communication system" http://t.co/W7cz07jJOt
RT @brembs: @Andrew84Kelly IF is not really 'calculated' at all: negotiation range between 0.5 and 25. http://t.co/jijd3E9bdd @SciPubLab @p…
RT @brembs: @Andrew84Kelly IF is not really 'calculated' at all: negotiation range between 0.5 and 25. http://t.co/jijd3E9bdd @SciPubLab @p…
RT @brembs: @Andrew84Kelly IF is not really 'calculated' at all: negotiation range between 0.5 and 25. http://t.co/jijd3E9bdd @SciPubLab @p…
RT @brembs: @Andrew84Kelly IF is not really 'calculated' at all: negotiation range between 0.5 and 25. http://t.co/jijd3E9bdd @SciPubLab @p…
RT @brembs: @Andrew84Kelly IF is not really 'calculated' at all: negotiation range between 0.5 and 25. http://t.co/jijd3E9bdd @SciPubLab @p…
uninted consequences of journal rank... http://t.co/C7sz3iPBCB
@JamesKilner Yes, there is: http://t.co/mLTDhDxeyP @deevybee
RT @Protohedgehog: Research shows that journal ranks (and impact factors) are nothing but bad for science http://t.co/TW8L7zvodi via @Front…
RT @Protohedgehog: Research shows that journal ranks (and impact factors) are nothing but bad for science http://t.co/TW8L7zvodi via @Front…
RT @Protohedgehog: Research shows that journal ranks (and impact factors) are nothing but bad for science http://t.co/TW8L7zvodi via @Front…
@JimJohnsonSci @froggleston @BioMickWatson Sorry, overstated. There IS a correlation, but weak, between -0.1 and +0.3 http://t.co/NKKS6uCV3B
Research shows that journal ranks (and impact factors) are nothing but bad for science http://t.co/TW8L7zvodi via @FrontiersIn
@tracey_423 @brembs I believe there are primary sources here: http://t.co/TW8L7zMZBS
RT @brembs: @BelindaBG Sources: 1. Pricetag: http://t.co/4Kd1rhimXm 2. unreliability: http://t.co/jijd3E9bdd @mbeisen @nature @sciencemagaz…
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank http://t.co/tHDTz7SFdR
@polarfire Then the problem is not #OpenAccess costs, but incompetent evaluation: http://t.co/mLTDhDOPXp and http://t.co/y11G1bBT5n
Sabemos que son vacaciones pero este artículo promete: http://t.co/2gYeforHqs
Interesting article by @brembs et al. on how #journal rankings are harmful to #science http://t.co/XnhoN021ot
http://t.co/LXjyvdKEwx " journal rank is a moderate to strong predictor of both intentional and unintentional scientific unreliability"
Interesting article by @brembs et al. on how #journal rankings are harmful to #science http://t.co/XnhoN021ot
Argument for abandoning the current journal publication altogether: http://t.co/LXjyvdKEwx
" IF violates even the most basic scientific standards, but predicts subjective judgments of journal quality." http://t.co/LXjyvdKEwx
http://t.co/LXjyvdKEwx " journal rank is a moderate to strong predictor of both intentional and unintentional scientific unreliability"
Argument for abandoning the current journal publication altogether: http://t.co/LXjyvdKEwx
Interesting article by @brembs et al. on how #journal rankings are harmful to #science http://t.co/XnhoN021ot
Interesting article by @brembs et al. on how #journal rankings are harmful to #science http://t.co/XnhoN021ot
Interesting article by @brembs et al. on how #journal rankings are harmful to #science http://t.co/XnhoN021ot
@JimJohnsonSci Sigh. Here is the evidence: http://t.co/ivC02KPMJk
@lteytelman @IanDworkin @jaimedash @JimJohnsonSci @mrgunn @EcoEvoGames sorry, wrong 2nd link: http://t.co/jijd3E9bdd fig. 1a
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/Gbd1KeXx09 #science
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
論文発表雑誌のIFを研究の質の評価に使うのは無意味ではなく、有害との分析結果"@Protohedgehog: impact factors only correlate with increased retraction rates http://t.co/grAl3uPBLb”
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/Gbd1KeXx09 #science
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/Gbd1KeXx09 #science
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/Gbd1KeXx09 #science
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/Gbd1KeXx09 #science
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/Gbd1KeXx09 #science
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/Gbd1KeXx09 #science
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/Gbd1KeXx09 #science
Why do scholars continue to publish in those journals where the worst science can be found, asks @brembs - see why: https://t.co/yon3Tszxke
Why do scholars continue to publish in those journals where the worst science can be found, asks @brembs - see why: https://t.co/yon3Tszxke
Why do scholars continue to publish in those journals where the worst science can be found, asks @brembs - see why: https://t.co/yon3Tszxke
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/Gbd1KeXx09 #science
Why do scholars continue to publish in those journals where the worst science can be found, asks @brembs - see why: https://t.co/yon3Tszxke
@SciPubLab @ferli90 @Medoek @LMU_Muenchen Daten für die letzten beiden Tweets: http://t.co/jijd3E9bdd
@SciPubLab @ferli90 @Medoek @LMU_Muenchen Daten für die letzten beiden Tweets: http://t.co/jijd3E9bdd
@1boring_ym Was Jan-Hendrick Schön scandal or crisis? Whang? Stapel? Hauser? Unreliability is endemic at GlamMagz: http://t.co/jijd3E9bdd
@d_mainwaring @RickyPo @RouhiRoo @McDawg @ccess @CharlesOppenh Want evidence? Plenty here. http://t.co/NKKS6uCV3B @brembs
@d_mainwaring @RickyPo @RouhiRoo @McDawg @ccess @CharlesOppenh Want evidence? Plenty here. http://t.co/NKKS6uCV3B @brembs