Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Frontiers https://t.co/lyV6XTYVWg
#Elsevier buys journal, changes the *stated* # of articles published/year, and impact factor goes up. Sound business https://t.co/oC2clmxdmW https://t.co/U6dW69yLI3
RT @_akpiper: The “decline-effect” says that the strength of evidence for a particular finding often declines over time. https://t.co/oC2cl…
"The level of reproducibility was so low no relationship betw. journal rank and reproducibility could be detected." https://t.co/oC2clmxdmW
The “decline-effect” says that the strength of evidence for a particular finding often declines over time. https://t.co/WzlxUgVEmJ #declin…
The “decline-effect” says that the strength of evidence for a particular finding often declines over time. https://t.co/haJ267kRXk #declinee
The “decline-effect” says that the strength of evidence for a particular finding often declines over time. https://t.co/oC2clmxdmW
@j2blather That's probably at least part of the explanation, but see: https://t.co/WJeYRpONfE
@kmeddings Here you go: https://t.co/WJeYRpONfE
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/pq8UhQPSkx
@amcreaven Here's the article: https://t.co/WJeYRpONfE
"journal rank is a moderate to strong predictor of both intentional and unintentional scientific unreliability" https://t.co/6VUJv3MMzt
@Merz Figure 1D https://t.co/xGIXDwm7lJ
RT @Science_Open: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/zATailcAbL via @brembs et al in @FrontiersIn
RT @Science_Open: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/zATailcAbL via @brembs et al in @FrontiersIn
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/zATailcAbL via @brembs et al in @FrontiersIn
RT @scholasticahq: A deep dive into the unintended consequences of journal ranking: https://t.co/E8tMNwNdRQ @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMuna…
RT @scholasticahq: A deep dive into the unintended consequences of journal ranking: https://t.co/E8tMNwNdRQ @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMuna…
RT @scholasticahq: A deep dive into the unintended consequences of journal ranking: https://t.co/E8tMNwNdRQ @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMuna…
RT @scholasticahq: A deep dive into the unintended consequences of journal ranking: https://t.co/E8tMNwNdRQ @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMuna…
RT @scholasticahq: A deep dive into the unintended consequences of journal ranking: https://t.co/E8tMNwNdRQ @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMuna…
A deep dive into the unintended consequences of journal ranking: https://t.co/E8tMNwNdRQ @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo #impactfactor
@MSalt69 @mrgunn @RickyPo @aarontay Have you read this? https://t.co/NKKS6uCV3B
@michaelhoffman I like @brembs's paper: https://t.co/WArJFwonlP
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/lMGv3NN0q4
I'm doing more research into why #impactfactors are crazy, & found this paper: https://t.co/E6pVVWfboe #scipolicy
RT @Science_Open: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank, by @brembs and colleagues https://t.co/zATailcAbL via @FrontiersIn…
RT @Science_Open: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank, by @brembs and colleagues https://t.co/zATailcAbL via @FrontiersIn…
RT @Science_Open: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank, by @brembs and colleagues https://t.co/zATailcAbL via @FrontiersIn…
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank, by @brembs and colleagues https://t.co/zATailcAbL via @FrontiersIn #ECRchat
RT @HannesZacher: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/Zc1dVehOB5
RT @HannesZacher: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/Zc1dVehOB5
RT @HannesZacher: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/Zc1dVehOB5
"Moreover, the data lead us to argue that any journal rank would have this negative impact. We suggest abandoning journals altogether" https://t.co/ExxLRpTTDS
JEP-General ranks 52 out of 103 journals in terms of replicability. https://t.co/PJtpwzpdQk https://t.co/7LTICpBur8
RT @chrisdc77: Anyone who believes in "journal rank",read this by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo https://t.co/bIL9haOJBY Then give yerse…
RT @chrisdc77: Anyone who believes in "journal rank",read this by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo https://t.co/bIL9haOJBY Then give yerse…
RT @chrisdc77: Anyone who believes in "journal rank",read this by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo https://t.co/bIL9haOJBY Then give yerse…
RT @chrisdc77: Anyone who believes in "journal rank",read this by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo https://t.co/bIL9haOJBY Then give yerse…
Anyone who believes in "journal rank",read this by @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo https://t.co/bIL9haOJBY Then give yerself a talking to https://t.co/jjdx3sRgns
RT @Protohedgehog: Just left a comment on @Science_Open with updated discussions on the Impact Factor https://t.co/lv22MQ60VU @brembs @Butt…
RT @Protohedgehog: Just left a comment on @Science_Open with updated discussions on the Impact Factor https://t.co/lv22MQ60VU @brembs @Butt…
RT @Protohedgehog: Just left a comment on @Science_Open with updated discussions on the Impact Factor https://t.co/lv22MQ60VU @brembs @Butt…
RT @Protohedgehog: Just left a comment on @Science_Open with updated discussions on the Impact Factor https://t.co/lv22MQ60VU @brembs @Butt…
Just left a comment on @Science_Open with updated discussions on the Impact Factor https://t.co/lv22MQ60VU @brembs @ButtonKate @MarcusMunafo https://t.co/uGeMLmv42P
@kdjhaveri ps. if you not seen this: https://t.co/D9V74P5G0y. Worth the read. Has some ideas using social media models.
RT @Science_Open: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/zATailub3j by @brembs
RT @fgvbmhs: Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/wzCAhkLmR3 … by @brembs @Science_Open
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/wzCAhkLmR3 … by @brembs @Science_Open
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank https://t.co/zATailub3j by @brembs
And also positively correlated with number of retractions and negatively correlated with sample size. Time for a change. https://t.co/arf2cgGtu4
RT @avigotsky: P-value errors positively correlated with impact factor (r > 0.5). Highly relevant to & in line w/ @brembs' review: https://…
RT @avigotsky: P-value errors positively correlated with impact factor (r > 0.5). Highly relevant to & in line w/ @brembs' review: https://…
"like dowsing, homeopathy or astrology, journal rank seems to appeal to subjective impressions of certain effects.." https://t.co/8cWCQrHveD
RT @Anhaeuser: Mutig: „we suggest (…) abandoning journals altogether, (…) will ultimately be necessary.“ @brembs' review: https://t.co/fkoh…
RT @Anhaeuser: Mutig: „we suggest (…) abandoning journals altogether, (…) will ultimately be necessary.“ @brembs' review: https://t.co/fkoh…
A slating of the use of journal impact factor- "using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice." https://t.co/6QzHEGrpIM
RT @Anhaeuser: Mutig: „we suggest (…) abandoning journals altogether, (…) will ultimately be necessary.“ @brembs' review: https://t.co/fkoh…
Mutig: „we suggest (…) abandoning journals altogether, (…) will ultimately be necessary.“ @brembs' review: https://t.co/fkohhgyoCA
RT @avigotsky: P-value errors positively correlated with impact factor (r > 0.5). Highly relevant to & in line w/ @brembs' review: https://…
RT @avigotsky: P-value errors positively correlated with impact factor (r > 0.5). Highly relevant to & in line w/ @brembs' review: https://…
RT @avigotsky: P-value errors positively correlated with impact factor (r > 0.5). Highly relevant to & in line w/ @brembs' review: https://…
RT @avigotsky: P-value errors positively correlated with impact factor (r > 0.5). Highly relevant to & in line w/ @brembs' review: https://…
I'll need to read this! https://t.co/tSBUeVoPeM
RT @avigotsky: P-value errors positively correlated with impact factor (r > 0.5). Highly relevant to & in line w/ @brembs' review: https://…
P-value errors positively correlated with impact factor (r > 0.5). Highly relevant to & in line w/ @brembs' review: https://t.co/UgnlINKqx7 https://t.co/Ln63oUZdTT
RT @brembs: Are Wikipedia editors referencing the least reliable sources? https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd https://t.co/o7Pc0ipCuO
RT @brembs: Are Wikipedia editors referencing the least reliable sources? https://t.co/jijd3E9bdd https://t.co/o7Pc0ipCuO
Deep #impact: unintended consequences of #journal rank https://t.co/VzAwptdMLG
RT @Poppi62: Just a reminder: "using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice" https://t.co/45XgKnRZnS
RT @Poppi62: Just a reminder: "using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice" https://t.co/45XgKnRZnS
RT @Poppi62: Just a reminder: "using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice" https://t.co/45XgKnRZnS
RT @Poppi62: Just a reminder: "using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice" https://t.co/45XgKnRZnS
RT @Poppi62: Just a reminder: "using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice" https://t.co/45XgKnRZnS
RT @Poppi62: Just a reminder: "using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice" https://t.co/45XgKnRZnS
Just a reminder: "using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice" https://t.co/45XgKnRZnS
RT @jeffoscoulos: Impact factor correlated with the retraction rate? https://t.co/f8H6xfFaWC https://t.co/YlxKPdCQIB
RT @Protohedgehog: Work by @brembs shown at #SpotOn16 - that impact factor you love? It's correlated with the retraction rate, no more! htt…
RT @Protohedgehog: Work by @brembs shown at #SpotOn16 - that impact factor you love? It's correlated with the retraction rate, no more! htt…
RT @Protohedgehog: Work by @brembs shown at #SpotOn16 - that impact factor you love? It's correlated with the retraction rate, no more! htt…
RT @jeffoscoulos: Impact factor correlated with the retraction rate? https://t.co/f8H6xfFaWC https://t.co/YlxKPdCQIB
RT @Protohedgehog: Work by @brembs shown at #SpotOn16 - that impact factor you love? It's correlated with the retraction rate, no more! htt…
RT @Protohedgehog: Work by @brembs shown at #SpotOn16 - that impact factor you love? It's correlated with the retraction rate, no more! htt…
RT @Protohedgehog: Work by @brembs shown at #SpotOn16 - that impact factor you love? It's correlated with the retraction rate, no more! htt…
RT @Protohedgehog: Work by @brembs shown at #SpotOn16 - that impact factor you love? It's correlated with the retraction rate, no more! htt…
RT @donaldorth: "IF generates an illusion of exclusivity and prestige based on an assumption that it predicts scientific quality, which is…
RT @donaldorth: "IF generates an illusion of exclusivity and prestige based on an assumption that it predicts scientific quality, which is…
RT @jeffoscoulos: Impact factor correlated with the retraction rate? https://t.co/f8H6xfFaWC https://t.co/YlxKPdCQIB
RT @donaldorth: "IF generates an illusion of exclusivity and prestige based on an assumption that it predicts scientific quality, which is…
RT @Protohedgehog: Work by @brembs shown at #SpotOn16 - that impact factor you love? It's correlated with the retraction rate, no more! htt…
@irrati0nal that impact factor our boss love https://t.co/sSZaMxKMwW
RT @jeffoscoulos: Impact factor correlated with the retraction rate? https://t.co/f8H6xfFaWC https://t.co/YlxKPdCQIB
RT @jeffoscoulos: Impact factor correlated with the retraction rate? https://t.co/f8H6xfFaWC https://t.co/YlxKPdCQIB
RT @donaldorth: "IF generates an illusion of exclusivity and prestige based on an assumption that it predicts scientific quality, which is…
Impact factor correlated with the retraction rate? https://t.co/f8H6xfFaWC https://t.co/YlxKPdCQIB
RT @Protohedgehog: Work by @brembs shown at #SpotOn16 - that impact factor you love? It's correlated with the retraction rate, no more! htt…