@ADdelMale @ElideMirce La mia fonte è questa https://t.co/3UclN0N4Eg Testato per due mesi. Poi approvato in emergenza. Non si conosce la sicurezza oltre i due mesi.
@RickBeyer2 @PureFaxx @FiveTimesAugust @CNN Well that's obviously false. Pfizer tested their vaccine in a massive clinical trial of over 43,000 people, found 95% protection against symptomatic *infection* and published the results in the New England Journa
@DrJBhattacharya Here are the clinical trials of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. It sure is surprising how many people don't understand that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is not the same thing as the disease it can cause (Covid), and the importance of that dis
@ninny_cotton @TimTrippDesign @AlexBerenson Yes, the exact same clinical trials. It is almost as if the claims that they were rigged were bogus. Part of the alt media nonsense that is parroted by the gullible. Here's the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine cl
@Silveira10Re Oh look, scientific proof: https://t.co/FRiVR0Re9j
@ADdelMale @SanctionsK @ElideMirce sui trial dei vaccini covid è tutto documentato. tempi, metodi, partecipanti, fasi e statistiche. dire che è sperimentale è una falsità che nessuno può dimostrare. https://t.co/CFEjrrBoKa
@dancalegria Fase 3 onderzoek: https://t.co/hgFS3DOxWQ
@rafaposo @elzorrotacneno Te tiran un vídeo con música dramática diciendo que los unicornios existen y te la crees 🤦🏻♂️ 1. La efectividad de las vacunas en cuanto a COVID ha sido probada desde perspectivas aritméticas hasta estudios con grupos de control
@MarcPirollo @flyingwasp13 @Zymurge13 @mwill68321 @gillradcliffe @JoeyMannarinoUS 43,000 people took part in trials which conferred 95% protection against covid. https://t.co/0ymWgjZL43.
@statonomic @CrustStar @os_gertjan @USMortality https://t.co/gKnzluQtaw Anyway man, you’re the classic example of Dunning Kruger…you have no knowledge about a subject but you’re extremely sure about your opinions! Of you’re actually interested in understa
@ClareCraigPath Neither. (The excerpt is about applicants (usually manufacturers) requirements prior to independent clinical trials. Clinical trials should continue to be independent, like these ones: https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
@likemytweets31 @DrDavidNL @Rodriramosdb @thuppetrutter @EWimmers @theadoremi Ik heb je al MEERMAALS studies en data aangeleverd. Jij leest ze gewoon niet. Ik maak geen claims, jij maakt ze, dan moet je ze maar bewijzen. https://t.co/8gDn5e9DPA https://t.c
@elzorrotacneno Respuesta a la Respuesta: “Doctor” no desinforme le pasó el estudio publicado en el New England Journal of Medicine (la reviste de más alto impacto) https://t.co/1HOlVuPV6I
@BFC_CBPC @GegouxTheodore @IngrahamAngle And yet, the vaccine does work. For the Moderna vaccine: https://t.co/uMXtA9ozdH For the Pfizer vaccine: https://t.co/K8NH6nnX84 Recent studies show that vaccine effectiveness reduces over time because negligent
@Klaerdenker @MikoscheM Welche Pfizer Studie meinen Sie? Die Zulassungsstudie, also diese? https://t.co/d5QC7fjGCH
@ninny_cotton @TimTrippDesign @AlexBerenson Yes, you've said a lot. If it is a fact then you'll have no trouble backing yourself with evidence that the peer reviewed clinical trials no longer meet the publishing standards of the New England journal of med
@ShariSebuck @drsimonegold Yawn. The vaccines were never designed to stop infection, but reduce getting Covid once infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, as documented in the clinical trials. https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
@Gbetra1 @UncleRuckus321 @P_McCulloughMD @pfizer @US_FDA @AdhesionsOrg @RandPaul @SenatorRennick @SenRonJohnson @drscottjensen @DrScottHadland @DrScottYoung @drscott_atlanta Nonsense. Look under “TRIAL PROCEDURES” or search for “saline placebo” in the refe
@JonathanHannah @judysimpson222 @DrSusanOliver1 @Deevoee @OutsideAllan Love people on Thread who THINK they have education, experience, training in Science, Vaccines, Immunology @JonathanHannah DOES NOT Couldn’t even READ Phase I/II or Phase II/III Clini
@TimTrippDesign @Mack76383148 @AlexBerenson Yes, you did say that. You haven't said what data that you appear to judge to be relevant. Who said what? I have no idea what you are referring to, you seem to mush up the two branches of the clinical trials.
@TimTrippDesign @Mack76383148 @AlexBerenson Mostly the criticism was of the deaths of people in the trial. Fact checkers, commentary on YouTube... ...there was a lot of talk about it. Specifically what injuries were removed from the clinical trials are y
@DrLoupis The vaccines did work. https://t.co/al0M4Xf2uA https://t.co/cV9Tg5V4Kk
@kid_krappy @Herd851 @Inversionism @Kevmacd Demonstrably false. Both the Pfrizer and Moderna study used a saline placebo. Can you admit you were mistaken? I'm betting you won't. https://t.co/j6soW7BeOf
@CLOUTECHRISTIN2 @Stop_AuX_FaKe @MG6212491750681 @Gromlevilainn @astynis C'est marrant qu'on te voie surtout raconter des conneries et pas répondre au sujet des études… Et là non plus, on t'a pas entendu : https://t.co/9M52nPTbSs
@ScepticalAussie @notthatpele @VigilantFox @naomirwolf So why were the assertions being made to get vaccinated for grandma? Remember? Don’t do it for yourself, do it for everyone else. People have conveniently developed amnesia when it comes to the pande
@JukosD17969 @SteffenCali @93Hoagie @tagesschau Die Zulassungsstudien der mRNA-Impfstoffe wurden als Placebo-Studie durchgeführt, Sie Brain. Aber nicht nocheinmal in Deutschland, weil die Wirkung jetzt bekannt ist. https://t.co/x4XeVm7v9X
@CLOUTECHRISTIN2 @Stop_AuX_FaKe @MG6212491750681 @astynis Non. Ils ont juste rappelé ce qui était marqué sur le rapport de l'étude initiale du vaccin, en première page. https://t.co/GpJ6KaTK05 Parce qu'en en effet, on ne PEUT PAS tester la transmissibili
@keiyou30 >「有効性を示すデータがあります」 新型コロナワクチンで感染防止の有効性を示す論文はありますか? ちなみにファイザーの治験論文の有効性は発症防止の有効性にすぎません。 https://t.co/omt1bcMPbu >with onset 治験当時のPCR検査の検体は鼻咽頭拭い液で毎日全員採取困難で発症者のみ検査。 https://t.co/1xUuAvuLYs
@FloydTh07562729 @Georges_Brum @Tidiane84101146 Au temps pour moi, c’est 95% d’efficacité dans la prévention des formes symptomatiques. https://t.co/Zdz9uTJlzH
@MuchemiKimani1 @CarlKenner @AlanGib63607450 @mreans724 @DrSusanOliver1 @IamBrookJackson https://t.co/iAJk8oeO12 Here is the trial. One of many
@Mack76383148 @TimTrippDesign @AlexBerenson Clearly, many of the statements that Roberts has made about there not being independent clinical trials are false. There have been independent clinical trials. Again, here they are: https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
@Mack76383148 @TimTrippDesign @AlexBerenson Sorry that you were misinformed, and believed some who should have known better. Here are independent clinical trials for the Pfizer's BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. Scroll down to see author affiliations. The
@eva774eva @DrDavidNL Wacht... jij maakt claims over "experimenteel" "levensgevaarlijk" dan moet jij die kunnen onderbouwen. the burden of proof is on the accuser. myocarditis: https://t.co/ZjRwB0Sh70 en https://t.co/XyGPL8LjhI veiligheid: https://t.co/8g
@Mack76383148 @TimTrippDesign @AlexBerenson I don't trust many people either. But the clinical trials were clear. A ton of people got it wrong, & many still do. "The vaccine met both primary efficacy end points, with more than a 99.99% probability o
@rLSJyYPiBjFvoeQ ファイザーの候補選択を他社もマネたので、RNA注入タイプの新型コロナワクチン接種でヒトの細胞から(根付き)スパイクが突出し生えたままになります。 この事はファイザー側の論文でも認められてます。 https://t.co/1mAPadG82V https://t.co/rjvn4I12TI
@MayaJOU1 @GroupeSafari Par exemple https://t.co/S6nsvWUI5g En fait, toutes celles qui ont été faites sur les souches qui étaient présentes fin 2020/début 2021
@dennis_giersig @V4725235469834 Link ist o.k. https://t.co/MWzLacnlOJ
RT @bill390291761: @dennis_giersig Hier ist der Link https://t.co/Tdk11g01UH
@SophieGuillot30 @AudacterConsei @Dr_Steph_GAYET L'étude de phase 3 de pfizer de 2020 mesurait l!efficacité contre les formes graves en population générale et la securite. Groupe traité vs placebo. https://t.co/4p9JfJA7UZ
@Jason_9905 @naomirwolf @RandyCarranco @WarRoom All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to
@kasumisecond @TubulerBells 一般公開前の臨床試験が早く切り上げられたこと自体も衝撃でしたが、その中身として盲検化やプラセボ群を維持した状態での長期的安全性の追跡調査が今後なされる見込みがなくなったと知ったとき、長期的安全性の調査は明示的に放棄されたのだと憤りました。 https://t.co/7jF4ughmuy
@StephenJPirie @DrEliDavid I said you had ZERO education in Science, Epidemiology, Healthcare, Vaccines or Immunology Explains why you THOUGHT vaccines weren't tested vs placebo They were 1) Phase I/II -> https://t.co/hODIwJ1d2v 2) Phase II/III -&g
@StephenJPirie @DrEliDavid You obviously have ZERO education, training, experience in Science, Epidemiology, Healthcare, Vaccines or Immunology @StephenJPirie ZERO research skill 1) Phase I/II -> https://t.co/hODIwJ1d2v 2) Phase II/III -> https://
@AlexBerenson Here's the clinical trials: "Among 10 cases of severe Covid-19 with onset after the first dose, 9 occurred in placebo recipients and 1 in a BNT162b2 recipient." Understand the difference between being infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus and ge
@BGatesIsaPyscho All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, g
@DKlemitz @13orangesbc @MatthewChr88157 @documentavi @MHRAgovuk @Jikkyleaks @Drs4CovidEthics All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95
@annmforti @ChrisEd16512812 @AskDrDrew @JohnBeaudoinSr @drdrew All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original co
@SpecHumbug @JackLinFLL @AlexBerenson It is likely you are mixing up the infection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and the disease (Covid). Here are the clinical trials, they clearly document people who get infected with the SARS-CoV-2, many who did not get Covi
@dbennett2009 @markw19829936 @JohnWest_JAWS @jneill All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compare
@haycraftb1 @NjbBari3 If you’re having trouble taking it from me - take it from the authors of an original vaccine RCT https://t.co/LKc4KbN6fa
@V4725235469834 @dennis_giersig https://t.co/PcJ9Me8o2Y Hat bei mir funktioniert.
RT @bill390291761: @dennis_giersig Hier ist der Link https://t.co/Tdk11g01UH
@dennis_giersig Hier ist der Link https://t.co/Tdk11g01UH
RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…
@MuslimJinn3 @xLisaAgx @Malcolm12345672 @pauline_party @townsquareguest @GRUFOR2 @senatorbabet @saviorqq @R_WORD_DEBASES @Ilovecoallots @Plucky16221611 @Peter_A_Nolan It's had preclinical, phase I, Phase II, and Phase three clinical trials, the latter with
RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…
@ShyttyP @MarkWar16520311 Which vaccine are your referring to? Pfizer was always 2 1° doses. https://t.co/IieM1BDjbl(30%20%CE%BCg%20per%20dose,vaccine%20efficacy%20greater%20than%2030%25.
@RossiGiampiero1 Sperimentazione completa https://t.co/R9sGu8b2lB Boccalone
@pasqualemariob1 Perché sei un mediocre ricercatore e non sai dove informarti,i dati erano già reperibili a Dicembre 2020. https://t.co/R9sGu8b2lB
RT @r_gerlinger: Wie gut wenn die Chefs Sahin und Türeci als Chefs von Biontech an Studien beteiligt sind und Interessenkonflikte verneint…
@HoschiMike @doc_ecmo Das ist falsch. Sie wurde bereits 2020 abgeschlossen: https://t.co/UraUE30ba8
⬇️
Wie gut wenn die Chefs Sahin und Türeci als Chefs von Biontech an Studien beteiligt sind und Interessenkonflikte verneint haben 🤦♀️ https://t.co/ErGEt6k83Y
@Awithonelison @Angie96219234 @jonathanstea @ShayeGanam Talk about word salad. FDA, Pfizer...who cares...the bottom line is that it had to be released by a Judge through a court order and that's because the results were not good. Here is your NEJM...same
@kivilcim_alper Aşılar önerilmeden önce elde edilen, Aralık 2020'de yayınlanan Pfizer Faz 3 Çalışması. https://t.co/2EN680jCtD 43.548 21.720'si aşılıve 21.728'i plasebo İki doz 16 yaş ve üzeri Wuhan suşuna karşı %95 etkinliğin ölçüldüğü geniş katılımcılı
@Katrei_Baran126 Faz 3 sonuçları Aralık 2020'de yayınlandı. https://t.co/2EN680jCtD https://t.co/RlRtURs3Eo
@ergun818 @DrGunerSonmez @virusfantom Size okumanız için iki link bırakacağım: https://t.co/rXI3TI2AJy https://t.co/sTcbCXmkkM Bunlar da olayı anlamanıza yardımcı olmayacaksa ekleyecek bir şeyim yok.
@LTCTheresaLong @jason_willz1 @NoneYea123 The approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% (not 100%) efficacy against original covid compared to p
@naomirwolf All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, good s
RT @CuendetV: @CorinneReverbel Étude Pfizer décembre 2020, dans l’annexe, suivez la ↩️sous LIMITATIONS ET QUESTIONS EN SUSPENS Le reste est…
@Veridant @LTCTheresaLong No, the shots aren’t harmful. This person is lying. I recommend sticking to primary source material to inform yourself. https://t.co/YoxKwRXmFF
@Daniel22305652 @dusk12222 @ura_soul @hoaxeye @DiedSuddenly_ At the time of the clinical trial, a 95% efficacy against symptomatic COVID. Less so in later variants but still a great reduction in hospitalization compared to unvaccinated. The safety also loo
@seeu88356641 @MartinZ_uncut @songpinganq Car ce n'était pas le sujet de l'étude de phase 3 pour l'obtention de l'AMM mais la sécurité et l'efficacité contre les formes graves. https://t.co/a2ifSmBeOb
RT @WLJKowa: Zulassungsstudie (et. al. klicken): https://t.co/Hj39aJoGsC
@CorinneReverbel Étude Pfizer décembre 2020, dans l’annexe, suivez la ↩️sous LIMITATIONS ET QUESTIONS EN SUSPENS Le reste est du marketing et de la désinformation. (Original en anglais) https://t.co/cKrJLSFDXr https://t.co/QlF0tTYhFr
@DarnelSugarfoo Make no mistake NEJM is all owned is all controlled by Big Pharma they do not care who they kill with vaccines They are still fabricating studies to create VAX fear you need it! or you will die the opposite has been true https://t.co/RU
@MartinZ_uncut @laurenceteamhcl @IvanChasseneuil Les laboratoires ont rendu des études de phases 3 en population générale. La phase 3 a été maintenu pour permettre de faire les études complémentaires sur les femmes enceintes ou l'efficacité face aux varian
@__Atreyu__ @f_philippot Les essais cliniques de Pfizer (publiées le 10/12/2020) précisaient un taux d'efficacité de 95% contre le Covid symptomatique. En médecine, ce sont les études scientifiques sérieuses qui comptent ! https://t.co/mBXSzIWfjm
@MONTMAN9500 @IanCopeland5 @Laser2Therapy You can start with the one you ignored earlier. Look up what efficacy means.
@RuiLima85 Mais aldrabice Rui? Tu não te cansas pois não. Tens aqui um dos estudos: https://t.co/JzM1fRWYvj https://t.co/lUZrioeXCF A tua mentira não tem limites de facto.
Zulassungsstudie (et. al. klicken): https://t.co/Hj39aJoGsC