RT @aloa5: Seht Ihr, ich schludere auch. 50 und 275 ... mir fehlt ein Kaffee. Aber ich mache auch nicht solche steilen Thesen auf. Jedenfa…
RT @aloa5: Die Studie ist im übrigen nicht geheim. Die Mortalität war indeed gleich: 0 [0/~90 zu 0/~500, welche sich in dem Zeitraum inf…
@schill_me @giulianophil @ulrikeguerot Die Studie wird in dem Artikel ja genannt. Die Kernaussagen sind frei nachzulesen: https://t.co/yMNydxQSxj
@SquintyNoodle @facts_stick @tasmaniacal1 Also, I have no idea what you’re talking about with no need to test. They were tested. I read the results. https://t.co/bL3VsNhjVe
Seht Ihr, ich schludere auch. 50 und 275 ... mir fehlt ein Kaffee. Aber ich mache auch nicht solche steilen Thesen auf. Jedenfalls nicht ohne den 4. Kaffee.☝️
Die Studie ist im übrigen nicht geheim. Die Mortalität war indeed gleich: 0 [0/~90 zu 0/~500, welche sich in dem Zeitraum infiziert hatten] Skandal.😏 https://t.co/f6wPTbnCKr https://t.co/ylRpo6mWgm
@ulrikeguerot Wie man merkt, daß viele keine Ahnung von der Materie haben, sieht man wieder hier. https://t.co/huRMbvbgau
@KateBeStill @sanseioha @kharaguchi データの取り方? いやいや。明らかに ワクチンの防御効果はしっかりしてますが。 副反応がないとはいいませんが、 新型コロナウイルス感染自体が ひどい生体へのダメージを おこすのですが。 https://t.co/ydOEINWFre
@koji54871536 @kharaguchi 初期から効果を示してます。 https://t.co/ydOEINWFre
@davidhadballs @Kp78A4 @rikirikiroo @Jikkyleaks @Jordan89935572 @TnAlistair @JohnBeaudoinSr @AskDrDrew @DrBMcDH @drdrew @Kevin_McKernan @NestCommander All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Ph
RT @goldenesbrett: Viele erinnern sich noch an diese Grafik. Ja, diese entstammt dieser Studie! Was hat es mit den Todesfällen auf sich? I…
Viele erinnern sich noch an diese Grafik. Ja, diese entstammt dieser Studie! Was hat es mit den Todesfällen auf sich? In beiden Gruppen starben 6 Proband*innen. Aber: bei der Studie haben 43.000 Personen mitgemacht. https://t.co/hkl0SAMnH8 https://t.co/Ct
@fubarspam @barbie1952 @no_pullbacks @MartyMakary @BretWeinstein Making unsupported claims? Did you not read any of the links I posted? https://t.co/6bIA1YLT1E
@bloke_new @NewshubNationNZ https://t.co/dLiB5Ph8Oi NEJM doesn’t seem to agree with you, send me some studies to read from these guys
RT @JanelleMMenard: The propaganda hacks are doing a great job reaching their loyal audiences, who uncritically absorb whatever they hear.…
@_snyoritaa @DarvinEmmi Bu da yalan :)https://t.co/imHaIvV9gi
@KristanLeeJames @uel_bergey @tylerblack32 Incorrect. This is the completion of the phase 3 trial. It says nothing about the trial continuing https://t.co/RDOqFuljQe
@jonsimschina The Pfizer RCT had “no COVID-19 associated deaths” https://t.co/CvkHggBstU https://t.co/eCn4zwk4fM
RT @JanelleMMenard: The propaganda hacks are doing a great job reaching their loyal audiences, who uncritically absorb whatever they hear.…
@MaddMaxJones That's Dr. Toots to you, "MaddMax." 😉 Challenge accepted. May you have the day you deserve. ✌🏽 https://t.co/3uBHK1YT0r
RT @JanelleMMenard: The propaganda hacks are doing a great job reaching their loyal audiences, who uncritically absorb whatever they hear.…
RT @JanelleMMenard: The propaganda hacks are doing a great job reaching their loyal audiences, who uncritically absorb whatever they hear.…
The propaganda hacks are doing a great job reaching their loyal audiences, who uncritically absorb whatever they hear. They then turn to sm platforms to troll actual qualified scientists by parroting that agitprop. Here. Clinical trials were conducted.
Remember this? @NEJM A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines. https://t.co/e0t3IC4GKc
@jasonpaige40661 @SingleDadRob @DrEricDing @Antonio_Caramia Just for the love of god go and read something peer-reviewed in a reputable journal. Like the actual trial paper. https://t.co/QTrHLxdVNB
@DKlemitz @ECUBrodySOM All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated contr
@TightyWighty69 @Kp78A4 @rikirikiroo @Jikkyleaks @Jordan89935572 @TnAlistair @JohnBeaudoinSr @AskDrDrew @DrBMcDH @drdrew @Kevin_McKernan @NestCommander All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer P
@_APWK_ @AaronSiriSG Point to where it says that please: https://t.co/YoxKwRXmFF
@BioEunuch @notinproportion @c_plushie @jacindaardern @AshBloomfield @chrishipkins @grantrobertson1 https://t.co/k1Bf9kYM2O ??? The human trials clearly happened, you should stop listening to propaganda
RT @naika_hashikure: ファイザー社「当社のワクチンは95%の有効性です!」 医クラ「すごい!NEJMに載ってるから間違いない!」 これが罷り通ってしまうのがEBM至上主義に陥った臨床医学です。 こんなの科学と呼べますか?件のNEJM論文も批判的に見れば不可解…
RT @BarryESharp: So, I will write this in childlike fashion, when doing a trial for vaccines such as Pfizer you give half a placebo, half t…
So, I will write this in childlike fashion, when doing a trial for vaccines such as Pfizer you give half a placebo, half the proper vaccine, send them home and wait to see what happens over a period of time. If the virus has peaked in a specific area and w
@MarieClaudeMas7 @JeremyFOUBERT1 @Sabobine_ @mervin13014 @francoisemarte4 Allez, je suis de bonne humeur aujourd'hui, je t'indique ce que tu aurais dû voir. https://t.co/tvGbLj2s5F https://t.co/GpJ6KaTcax https://t.co/Ck79QNsLlM
@louants @Johnincarlisle @YouTube "The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety." https://t.co/RDOqFuljQe https://t.co/S1gK4kVoUF
@Ecccm2Ecccm 注射型コロナワクチンには発症・重症予防効果があります。 しかし、感染予防効果を示すエビデンスがありません。発症予防効果があって感染予防効果が無いため大量の無症状感染者発生し感染爆発起こしてる疑いが濃厚です。つまりマクロ的に考えるとマッチ・ポンプなのです。 https://t.co/SQPHaUTGmf
@kutsunasatoshi @mazzaskii しかし、注射型の新型コロナワクチンに対しては以下の理由により反対しています。 (1)発症予防効果があるのに感染予防効果が無いため大量の無症状感染者が集団接種で発生し感染爆発を引き起こしている疑いが濃厚な事。 https://t.co/SQPHaUTGmf 13/
@studiocorvo ワクチン推進派医師らは注射型新型コロナワクチンに感染予防効果のエビデンスが無い事を未だ認めてません。最重要部分のエビデンスが無いのです。(発症予防効果・重症予防効果のみで感染予防効果が無いので多数の無症状感染者が発生し感染爆発引き起こした疑いが濃厚です。) https://t.co/SQPHaUTGmf
@Drunkard_Baka >重症化しなかった人沢山いる それは接種の効果として認めます。 しかし、発症予防効果があるのに感染防止効果がないため大量の無症状感染者が発生し、感染爆発を引き起こしている疑いが濃厚です。マッチ・ポンプです。 https://t.co/SQPHaUTGmf
@Drunkard_Baka >ワクチン接種したためにコロナ感染しなかった人、 >感染しても重症化しなかった人沢山いるよ。 注射型の新型コロナワクチンは感染予防効果は未確認です。 発症予防効果はあっても感染予防効果が無いと考えられ、接種した者が大量に無症状感染している疑いがあります。 https://t.co/SQPHaUTGmf
@LeafsRag @rg_jill @JeromeAdamsMD I suppose this study was my imagination then. https://t.co/6bIA1YLT1E
@stevocarter1 @ilittlewood @Johnincarlisle @YouTube They published the phase 3 results on December 11, 2020 as all the primary results were in which were the basis for EUA. Yes, they still continued the follow-up after that. https://t.co/agNnC19EhG
@Topaz20211 @Kawasaki_Mom07 @bsuther7 Topaz, this looked sterilizing. i thought we had won and it was game over. https://t.co/aFW5WqPwb5 https://t.co/KjOSGFhWbL
@DelgaFranc84274 @HeloPalette @EricLebegue @john_Larbalete @lemondefr Vous savez lire ? C'est quoi ça ? Réponse : un essai de phase 3 en double aveugle randomisé sur 40000 personnes. https://t.co/AAHvq6uyQJ
@DelgaFranc84274 @HeloPalette @EricLebegue @john_Larbalete @lemondefr Confusion complotiste classique. Des essais de phase 3 ont bien été terminés et publiés AVANT la mise sur le marché. La preuve : https://t.co/AAHvq6uyQJ
@HeloPalette @DelgaFranc84274 @EricLebegue @john_Larbalete @lemondefr Voilà le rapport d'essai de phase 3 conclusif. Encore une fois il recopie les réseaux sociaux mais n'a rien vérifié. https://t.co/AAHvq6uyQJ
@Kawasaki_Mom07 @OpenVAERS @richardursomd Evade science? No. You are evading science and making unsubstantiated claims. Here for instance is Pfizer's original safety and efficacy clinical trial. There's plenty more science if you look for it. https://t.co/
@SHomburg Und Personen > 85 sowie auch Personen mit einer Reihe von Komorbiditäten wie Diabetes oder Bluthochdruck waren von der Teilnahme an der Zulassungsstudie ausgeschlossen - gerade derjenige Personenkreis, dem die 💉 dann besonders anempfohlen wurd
@OpenVAERS @richardursomd Clinical trials proved the safety and efficacy of covid vaccines. Here is Pfizer's clinical trial. There were over 40,000 participants. https://t.co/92SZq6Xx4q
@naika_hashikure エビデンス重視とか言うワクチン推進派医師らが注射型の新型コロナワクチンに感染防止効果があると主張するのは大ウソ。肝心部分にエビデンスが無いのだ。 https://t.co/SQPHaUTGmf
@grantmcknz @bobble05132522 @Questio31810600 @redheadlass1402 @judysimpson222 @SpiderCatNZ @DrSusanOliver1 @GVDBossche ...and from the beginning? That is another example of an unsupported claim, aka BS. Here are the clinical trials which show that vaccin
@DKiddler19276 @Rudofaux1 @Slotyp_ist @bennyjohnson @GOP So you haven't even read the studies and you're making claims? https://t.co/tVHDRjUhQf https://t.co/JkFo13jwEM https://t.co/jhBK0xWonV
@MimiinNZ @Questio31810600 @judysimpson222 @SpiderCatNZ @DrSusanOliver1 Said "it". No quote. (You might be referring to the hopes that vaccines represent.) You aren't very good at this, are you? This was first published Dec 10, 2020. https://t.co/Ca2VA
@PavlosPavlova @PhilipRafferty5 @VikiLovesFACS @kevinault More people died in the placebo group. 2 in the vaccinated group and 4 in the placebo group. The placebo group deaths had a hemorrhagic stroke, a heart attack, and 2 unknown causes. https://t.co/6b
@kazeokanjiro_00 @vitsant1975 @giusbrindisi Ecco lo studio pfizer, dimmi che lo capisci?🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 .. scherzavo… 🤣🤣🤣🤣… https://t.co/ErCRB7FLZk
@grantmcknz @Questio31810600 @bobble05132522 @redheadlass1402 @SpiderCatNZ @judysimpson222 @DrSusanOliver1 A lot of people got it wrong for sure. If you have an exact quote, the context, then perhaps we can see. That said, what is in the trials is unequi
@GroverManchild @EdKrassen @ThomasPaineBand https://t.co/238mfvVKVt Scroll down to "letters" for peer statements.
@Questio31810600 @judysimpson222 @ridingNC700 @redheadlass1402 @SpiderCatNZ @grantmcknz @DrSusanOliver1 ...and again, the vaccines work on people once they are infected. Just like it says in the clinical trials. Are you that dumb you really don't get it?
@KuryloMark @grantmcknz @RageSalvation @MedRest1 @Questio31810600 @SpiderCatNZ @DrSusanOliver1 Good luck in trying to make everyone stop calling mRNA vaccines, vaccines. Do you have much experience in trying to change the English language? How are you go
@wohya 注射型の新型コロナワクチンには発症予防効果・重症予防効果・死亡阻止効果はある。 しかし、感染予防効果が無く、なまじ発症予防効果があるため大量の無症状感染者が発生し、感染爆発を引き起こしている。 つまり自分で火をつけて消火する「マッチ・ポンプ」なのである。 https://t.co/SQPHaUTGmf
効果の確認してなかったそうですよファイザー
@SwedgenC @2020_wth @naomirwolf no they didnt. Pregnancy was excluded from the pfizer trials https://t.co/RDOqFuljQe
@AndyStraus1 @CoOutofSpac3 @Dt_Aerzteblatt Falsch, falsch, falsch Ein "paar" Studien https://t.co/MH53lYS2ep https://t.co/5zxnnE7Akg https://t.co/jBzqX0PT4F https://t.co/RnJU36HgDS https://t.co/mATpKr3hjS https://t.co/jTMoklki5P https://t.co/L8ufX6p9Rr H
@rikirikiroo @TightyWighty69 @Kp78A4 @Jikkyleaks @Jordan89935572 @TnAlistair @JohnBeaudoinSr @AskDrDrew @DrBMcDH @drdrew @Kevin_McKernan @NestCommander All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer P
RT @wabbit011235813: May I remind people that THIS is what was sold "The first primary end point was the efficacy of BNT162b2 against conf…
@goodough99 @TerrenceBeBack All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated
@MarkWar16520311 @steyn_riaan No, from Pfizer's original clinical trial (against the wild or delta strain) it was 95% effective. https://t.co/92SZq6Xx4q
RT @wabbit011235813: May I remind people that THIS is what was sold "The first primary end point was the efficacy of BNT162b2 against conf…
@giorgioa_sn80 @GfveGianfra @Viminale @Palazzo_Chigi @marcellogemmato @FrancoZaffini @FratellidItalia @LegaSalvini Posa il fiasco. https://t.co/R9sGu8b2lB Trials superati senza problemi.
Next time you hear some expert say the vaccines were not meant to prevent infection, think of the clinical trials and think of what was sold to the public at that time.
The fact that you didn't end up on a vent or dead was SECONDARY. "Major secondary end points included the efficacy of BNT162b2 against severe Covid-19." Bait and switch. https://t.co/LIwFnMDHtf
May I remind people that THIS is what was sold "The first primary end point was the efficacy of BNT162b2 against confirmed Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose" https://t.co/LIwFnMDHtf
RT @Masanori_Asami: @mayatine ワクチン推進派医師にはいまだに注射型の新型コロナワクチンに感染防止効果があると誤解したままの低能が多い。話が通じず困ったものです。 https://t.co/SQPHaUTGmf
@mayatine ワクチン推進派医師にはいまだに注射型の新型コロナワクチンに感染防止効果があると誤解したままの低能が多い。話が通じず困ったものです。 https://t.co/SQPHaUTGmf
@ichigumapanda まだ、そういう誤解をされたままなのですか? 新型コロナワクチンには感染予防効果はありません。あるのは発症予防効果と重症予防効果です。 https://t.co/SQPHaUTGmf
@fgidf98fj9jh0h 危険性が、 (1)mRNAワクチンによるものなのか、 (2)スパイクの根の部分の配列を含む候補を選定した選定ミスによるものなのか、 (3)注射型の新型コロナワクチン全般の問題なのか、 を見極める必要があります。 https://t.co/1mAPadG82V https://t.co/evOLyHhBpj
@cultofprsnalty @AsanovicMik @BadAppelcNFT @Not_So_Fungible @CNN 95% efficacy in reducing individual infection in 2020. I’ll break it down further just in case: you cannot transmit a virus to another person if you don’t become infected with it. https://t.
@JoseNata9 @News12NJ Seriously dude - try reading a medical journal before trying to give medical advice. And btw - billions of doses have now been given. Live in fear of modern medicine. You aren’t relevant to me. https://t.co/1B0wj0Pew9
@MarkSidloi @LionAdvocacy There was definitely safety and effectiveness data before Health Canada approval. Perhaps not as much as in other circumstances. https://t.co/ygyT08yTRq
@Pablosquest And failed to realize those were secondary endpoints. The study results were published. https://t.co/8oCJqgrnrQ https://t.co/ieQmd2RnvJ https://t.co/zstrUf5R8P
@TRLines2 @alainpf78 @marcoleru @Dr_Steph_GAYET Tant qu'un vaccin n'est pas commercialisé, un labo ne peut fournir que des essais cliniques (43 000 participants pour Pfizer), où il est IMPOSSIBLE de mesurer le taux de réduction de transmission. 10/12/20 =
@ASaninTX @dammitshawn1 @nikkiteschner @SenDuckworth In Dec. 2020, studies showed 90-100% efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine. The city of Chicago noted “risk of infection, hospitalization, and death are all much lower in people who are vaccinated compared to t
RT @Masanori_Asami: >あまりにデマすぎて、 ミクロ・レベルで根拠があります。それもファイザー側の論文で。(引用tweetにリンク有り。) 細胞からスパイクが生えるので、血管の細胞同士の密着性が低下し血圧に耐えれなくなり大動脈解離が起きやすくなると考えられま…
RT @B61311321: @remmy_robertson @RandPaul Here's the kicker... Ready? Unvaccinated people also have less than 1% chance of contracting SARS…
@AltoTagliato @untizio @borghi_claudio @SabrySocial Qui trova tutte e 3 le fasi del trial https://t.co/sbduWW2sj4
@DelFo72426543 @silvano_trotta Tant qu'un vaccin n'est pas encore commercialisé, un labo ne peut fournir que des essais cliniques (sur 43 000 participants pour le vaccin Pfizer). 10/12/20 => 95% d'efficacité contre le Covid symptomatique https://t.co/
@0x_Crash @silvano_trotta Tant qu'un vaccin n'est pas encore commercialisé, un labo ne peut fournir que des essais cliniques (sur 43 000 participants pour le vaccin Pfizer). 10/12/20 => 95% d'efficacité contre le Covid symptomatique https://t.co/kLCcN
@celiberaregis @KarenLorre @silvano_trotta Tant qu'un vaccin n'est pas encore commercialisé, un labo ne peut fournir que des essais cliniques (sur 43 000 participants pour le vaccin Pfizer). 10/12/20 => 95% d'efficacité contre le Covid symptomatique h
@KarenLorre @silvano_trotta Tant qu'un vaccin n'est pas encore commercialisé, un labo ne peut fournir que des essais cliniques (sur 43 000 participants pour le vaccin Pfizer). 10/12/20 => 95% d'efficacité contre le Covid symptomatique https://t.co/kL
@silvano_trotta Tant qu'un vaccin n'est pas encore commercialisé, un labo ne peut fournir que des essais cliniques (sur 43 000 participants pour le vaccin Pfizer). 10/12/20 => 95% d'efficacité contre le Covid symptomatique https://t.co/kLCcNNeHmI