@Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8 @URakFREE ただ、予防効果が発症予防効果であって感染予防効果ではないのですよ。 https://t.co/Ft3AVw6GFf 発症(with onset)した者のみ感染確認してるので無症状感染者を把握していません。 当時のPCR検査の検体は鼻咽頭拭い液で、喉の粘膜を傷めるので定期的に全員のPCR検査できなかったのです。 https://t.co/ef2e9XYiqH
@Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8 @URakFREE >逆にワクチンが安全で有効とかいう論文などない。 一応、ファイザーの治験論文は安全で有効だと主張してはいます。 https://t.co/Ft3AVw6GFf "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine"
@AlaryPatrick @VBaudoux Pardon ?! J'ai juste un doctorat en microbiologie !! Ecoutez, ça ce sont les essais cliniques à pseudos 6 mois de Pfizer : https://t.co/xDJLIHYHxu 1ere question : pourquoi les données sont publiées en RRR ?
@naomirwolf @Novacac Naomi, yet again you mix up transmission of a virus with a vaccine designed to reduce the number of people who get Covid once infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In 2023, shame on you!! This was known from the outset, as documented in
@2ALD33 @davebro__ @albertaNDP 3/ Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https://t.co/C3mgIumwb5 https://t.co/FtULfFnlI1 >>>
@VigilantFox @joerogan @billmaher I guess no one wants to read the actual study. Pfizer reported 95% efficacy against Covid, based on 8 cases of Covid in vaccine group, and 162 in placebo group. https://t.co/SNFYoF4Iuq. But you go ahead and believe Rogan i
@URakFREE @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8 (1)ファイザーの治験論文の予防効果は発症(with onset)者の感染確認で発症予防効果で感染予防効果でない。 https://t.co/Ft3AVw68PH 参加者全員に定期的にPCR検査等のNAATし無症状感染者も含む感染者を把握した感染防止効果の論文はCleveland Clinic論文だけ。 https://t.co/wS9zyMHMKx (続) https://t.co/QH9lDEZcoO
@sjsharksfanta @EdKrassen You are wrong. Clinical trials showed that it did prevent infection from the original strain 95%. If you are not infected, you can't transmit the virus. Omicron and other variants are breakthrough infections. https://t.co/cnkXHTB
@STRAT777 @Truth_in_Number @zoeharcombe I have no idea what you’re talking about. In the Pfizer initial study there were 9 vax vs. 169 placebo COVID infections. The groups started to diverge a day 10 after the first dose, and kept diverging past dose 2.
@JasonMaginnis @cockadoodledog @thecoastguy @GiveUsAQuid Hahaha. And in so holding such an absurd belief you confirm you have poor reading comprehension. You have been misled. The vaccines worked from the outset. https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
@PepeU04405306 @MannheimVon @HekaRaisanen Tutkimattomia? Millä perusteella tutkimattomia? Tässä esimerkiksi verraisarvioitu faasi 3 Pfizerin rokotteesta. Julkaistu joulukuun 2020 alussa. https://t.co/R1Z0YCzGe6
@ajwodecki @drdrew Except they were placebo RCT tested… https://t.co/Vq5F4Nb7XX https://t.co/2nAGLU5q4t
@OrHekto @Tidiane84101146 @p_duval @JulienPain @tristanmf @RReichstadt @f_philippot Bah non c'est les résultats de l'essai clinique https://t.co/kYYLcuEGjf Vous confondez avec la période de suivi
@RetractionWatch When do you intend to care about that obvious fraud 🤔? https://t.co/Rhyrggpa8f
@JoseMartin1977 @ClaudeSteve6 Une des premières études à large échelle sur plus de 43’000 volontaires: https://t.co/zarAQHuhfW
@habari66800176 @chezronify @ChildrensHD "This report does not address the prevention of Covid-19 in other populations, such as younger adolescents, children, and pregnant women" https://t.co/RDOqFuljQe
@Fgironella13 @DeusVul94229466 Si, porque tengo razón…hoy me voy a inflar a difundir ciencia gracias a ti😘😘 https://t.co/NL2FX0YlmX
@LearnedSand @MonicaGandhi9 Are you sure you know what you're talking about? https://t.co/UcvNWTlqVi
@SteveRand133 @jeanproutepipou @dr646464 Ce ne sont pas des arguments obsolètes, ce sont les faits. https://t.co/AAHvq6uyQJ
@dag_waddell @CaulfieldTim That’s a conspiracy theory sorry. I did read the Pfizer studies. Serious adverse affects low and similar group tx vs placebo. Importantly the trial demonstrates excellent benefit in Covid mortality and morbidity, now shown to be
@moss_isley @7Glenn5 @ClareCraigPath I'm not familiar with what you mean by the phrase "immune drop", despite spending years reading research about the immune system and related. In fact, what research I have read shows the opposite, including this: http
@LeadingReport A "total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo" https://t.co/rmkauMiOjl
@BatmanArrow1 @titimalinmenton @silvano_trotta Ce qui compte en médecine, ce sont les études scientifiques validées par des pairs. 1) Essais cliniques du vaccin Pfizer (10 déc 2020) = https://t.co/kLCcNNeHmI 2) Etude du PHE (Public Health England) (Avril
@silvano_trotta Ce qui compte en médecine, ce sont les études scientifiques validées par des pairs. 1) Essais cliniques du vaccin Pfizer (10 déc 2020) = https://t.co/kLCcNNeHmI 2) Etude du PHE (Public Health England) (Avril 2021) = https://t.co/UCKQG1LdC
@silvano_trotta Ce qui compte en médecine, ce sont les études scientifiques validées par des pairs = 1) Essais cliniques du vaccin Pfizer (10 déc 2020) = https://t.co/kLCcNNeHmI 2) Etude du PHE (Public Health England) (Avril 2021) = https://t.co/UCKQG1Ld
@Keven_O_Green @silvano_trotta Ce qui compte en médecine, ce sont les études scientifiques validées par des pairs = 1) Essais cliniques du vaccin Pfizer (10 déc 2020) = https://t.co/kLCcNNeHmI 2) Etude du PHE (Public Health England) (Avril 2021) = https:
@gleasondj @Creativologist @Jasmina6817 @MdBreathe @Walgreens @MethodistHosp All you have is a big NUH UH. I just proved you were wrong. Your "court ordered document releases" are imaginary. I cite scientific papers that have NOT BEEN RETRACTED. You jus
@gleasondj @Creativologist @Jasmina6817 @MdBreathe @Walgreens @MethodistHosp Question based on false premise. They did do double blind trials BEFORE releasing mRNA vaccines. Who told you they didn't? Where did you get that claim? Why didn't anti-vaxers
@OceanEvery @entiquing @MdBreathe @Walgreens @MethodistHosp Lying. Anti-vaxery is built on Wakefield's scientific fraud. Double blind clinical trials proved mRNA vaccines were safe & effective BEFORE release to the public. https://t.co/iPTt2XLSvc http
@JenniferSey I care. They all evaded vaccines? Vaccines work by REDUCING the number of people who when infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, got Covid, & less severe for those who got Covid. As documented in the clinical trials & confirmed by subs
@momotose @Gooneriba_4Azm @mph_for_doctors >普通は知りたい情報は理論ではなく、 >実際に起きたその影響だと思うんですけどね。 新型コロナワクチンは感染防止効果は示されてません。 https://t.co/NqvKTNjWWQ また、HPVワクチン推奨するTaka医師に15歳で接種した少女が更年期頃の45歳に効果があるのかエビデンス示せと言ってください。
@Gooneriba_4Azm @momotose @mph_for_doctors ミクロ・レベルでも新型コロナワクチンで血管が劣化する根拠があります。それもファイザー側の論文で。(引用tweetにリンク有り。) 細胞からスパイクが生えるので、血管の細胞同士の密着性が低下し血圧に耐えれなくなり大動脈解離が起きやすくなると考えられます。 https://t.co/1mAPadG82V https://t.co/Q7BJNs5u0u
@GValeau @delasttours @MemeSauciflard @SahabiaAli @lexquismot @roropapa4 @Woodynist @LeBigChatain666 @MartinZ_uncut Et toi tu l'as découvert et compris quand le 🤡 ? https://t.co/hStmNBuu3W https://t.co/n6cQxLSb22
@GValeau @delasttours @MemeSauciflard @SahabiaAli @lexquismot @roropapa4 @Woodynist @LeBigChatain666 @MartinZ_uncut Je sais que t'aimes pas trop que je le remette mais voilà TON tweet de sachant qui sait. T'avais pas compris ! 🤡 Sinon quel scoop hein, y av
@GValeau @delasttours @MemeSauciflard @SahabiaAli @lexquismot @roropapa4 @Woodynist @LeBigChatain666 @MartinZ_uncut Relis lentement la conclusion de l'étude que tu prétends avoir comprise et on va voir où tu te situes TOI https://t.co/hStmNBuu3W https://t
@GValeau @LiegerMarc48801 @cit_dechue @laurenceteamhcl @Woodynist @SahabiaAli @LeBigChatain666 @MartinZ_uncut Et t'as rien compris à la première. Illustration le 🤡https://t.co/hStmNBuu3W https://t.co/9nTI4uqLHe
@GValeau @bonnesante73 @LiegerMarc48801 @laurenceteamhcl @cit_dechue @Woodynist @SahabiaAli @LeBigChatain666 @MartinZ_uncut Vu comment t'as compris l'étude sur le vaccin Pfizer, tu devrais éviter de te poser en champion de la lecture des papiers... https:/
@GValeau @delasttours @MemeSauciflard @SahabiaAli @lexquismot @roropapa4 @Woodynist @LeBigChatain666 @MartinZ_uncut T'es grillé le nE✓neU, la ramène pas. Je te l'ai mis en français, visiblement tu ne comprends pas l'anglais... https://t.co/hStmNBuu3W https
@delasttours @MemeSauciflard @SahabiaAli @lexquismot @Madame__Chipie @roropapa4 @Woodynist @LeBigChatain666 @MartinZ_uncut Non toujours pas. Relis l'essai clinique du vaccin tu veras : https://t.co/UYQ86Kn3oB L'efficacité de 95% n'est pas contre l'infe
>あまりにデマすぎて、 ミクロ・レベルで根拠があります。それもファイザー側の論文で。(引用tweetにリンク有り。) 細胞からスパイクが生えるので、血管の細胞同士の密着性が低下し血圧に耐えれなくなり大動脈解離が起きやすくなると考えられます。 https://t.co/1mAPadG82V https://t.co/cQDyQfr4yY
@TheoFleury14 IQ over 100 needed to comprehend "BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6)" https://t.co/QRLKQ1LGg4 Ops, I forgot "Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideolog
@AndrewS80507515 @Jikkyleaks @MonicaGandhi9 Oh, you didn't hear? No wonder you're confused. 1.https://t.co/RSyNxjPyR8 2.https://t.co/K3EWYY4BU0 3.https://t.co/VsOFnXtBu3
@ShinJitsu34 @gator_gum @jordanbpeterson I prefer to directly read the clinical trials directly. A ton of people got them wrong. The vaccines work by REDUCING the number of infected people who got Covid and the severity if they did. https://t.co/Ca2VA5j
@TimTrippDesign @DrJBhattacharya "Two BNT162b2 recipients died (one from arteriosclerosis, one from cardiac arrest), as did four placebo recipients (two from unknown causes, one from hemorrhagic stroke, and one from myocardial infarction)." "No Covid-19–a
@TimTrippDesign @DrJBhattacharya “No deaths were considered by the investigators to be related to the vaccine or placebo. No Covid-19–associated deaths were observed." You are spreading false information Tim. https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
@TimTrippDesign @DrJBhattacharya Repeating the data as if it proves your point is stupid. With the clinical trials, more unvaccinated got Covid than vaccinated people. https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
@JoshPower80 @ChristinaPushaw Oh stop with the lying. Double blind clinical trials proved the vaccine was safe & effective before it was released. We DID know it's safe and effective. https://t.co/iPTt2XLSvc https://t.co/q9FjCWAjJr
@M_Anthony86 @BarryESharp @PaulMitchell_AB Prove it. Link? Study? I've got one https://t.co/DrM7AXod8c
@JeanKev_Apeupre @SaiyanBio Sur cette étude de 43548 personnes oui. https://t.co/6Vqc4qMoBl https://t.co/KQEGri3dbZ
@doconouma_honeo @Tsi5HgGJOU9n4Bz @tiger19530805 @kharaguchi https://t.co/ydOEINW7BG フェルナンド氏をふくむ、 たくさんの臨床研究で 有効性示されてるよね。
@jetfuel101 @Azula163 @ABC That's obviously false. Pfizer tested their vaccine in a massive clinical trial of over 43,000 people, found 95% protection against symptomatic infection, and published the results in the New England Journal of Medicine in Dec 20
@1972tomek Po pierwsze - zadaniem szczepionki jest ochrona przed wystąpieniem choroby oraz złagodzenie jej przebiegu. Wystarczy przeczytać pierwsze publikacje na ten temat, jak one były definiowane https://t.co/lngf672N1j https://t.co/nuXFrQpkWJ
@Tsi5HgGJOU9n4Bz @tiger19530805 @kharaguchi ご自身でしらべる? ワクチン効くと言う臨床研究 がたくさんある中で お前が効かないと主張してるんだよなあ? さっさと原著論文出せって。 https://t.co/ydOEINWFre
@TimTrippDesign @DrJBhattacharya Getting infected without getting Covid is good. Above, I have posted the clinical trials to make the point that we know the vaccine REDUCES (not eliminates) vaccinated people from getting Covid from the outset. https://t.
@Herd851 @CaccioppoliMike @DrJBhattacharya Appreciate your efforts "Herd851" to add to this exchange. Unfortunately they lack sufficient specifitity to respond to. What aren’t randomized? Look harder at what? Efficacy is a specific calculation, for exampl
@Herd851 @CaccioppoliMike @DrJBhattacharya Saying "practically everyone gets Covid" may be a result of your confusing the SARS-CoV-2 virus for Covid. They're not the same. I can't find the graph or the references you refer to in the clinical trials which
@CaccioppoliMike @DrJBhattacharya Sounds like you need to learn some stuff about what words mean and how context works. It is true that more people who get vaccinated don't get Covid. Just as it was documented in the clinical trials. https://t.co/Ca2VA5
@SaysJax @SteveRickettsSP @mountain_ted Can you provide a link to such studies? https://t.co/ygyT08zrGY
@Savecan1 @poirazis Τα επιχειρήματα για τις ταυτότητες είναι τα ίδια με τα εμβόλια. Bill Gates, τσιπάρισμα, αντίχριστος, gps κ.α. Αυτό είναι ένα επίσημο paper που αποδεικνύει πως τα mRNA δοκιμάστηκαν όπως όλα τα αλλά εμβόλια. Ρίξε μια μάτια. https://t.co/o
@Tiller56138 @BarryESharp @PaulMitchell_AB @Loretlrmr1234 What proof do would you like? This one? https://t.co/DrM7AXnFiE
@SheilaGault3 @joshinthehouse3 @BarryESharp @PaulMitchell_AB @Loretlrmr1234 Nonsense. It has been proven it reduces the chances of getting covid. That was required before it received approval. https://t.co/ygyT08yTRq
@naika_hashikure 実はファイザーの治験論文 https://t.co/Ft3AVw6GFf の予防の有効性は発症防止効果であって感染防止効果ではないのです。 治験では発症(with onset)した者のみ感染確認してます。当時はPCR検体は鼻咽頭拭い液で定期的に全員検査できなかったからです。 そのため大量の無症状感染者が除外されてます。 https://t.co/uCLlTqyfkq
@48chevyguy @bow_canadian @SteveRickettsSP The trials proved it did. https://t.co/ygyT08yTRq Real life data shows it does work. https://t.co/7sWQl6FOsc
確認されているのは論文だけで現実は死者が増えている。 それはなぜなのか、答えを自分なりに考えて仮説を自分なりに考えるということをしないからこんなバカ医者が出来上がるという例なので晒しておく。 副作用のない薬はない。 #医者につけるクスリはない #コロナワクチン
お前はバカだかお前はバカだから、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
@FlorianLemaitr5 @EMCrc09 Voici l'étude de phase 3 proposée par pfizer. On peut y lire en titre : Efficacy and safety. https://t.co/a2ifSmBeOb
@SharonLenz19 @zap_lock "They did not pass the safety trials!" WRONG, WRONG, WRONG @SharonLenz19 Phase I/II Trial -> https://t.co/hODIwJ1d2v Phase II/III Trial -> https://t.co/T9ZiFQprIb
@sudokuvariante Bah oui Sherlock. Faut juste savoir lire…
RT @SanctionsK: @ADdelMale @ElideMirce La mia fonte è questa https://t.co/3UclN0N4Eg Testato per due mesi. Poi approvato in emergenza. No…
RT @SanctionsK: @ADdelMale @ElideMirce La mia fonte è questa https://t.co/3UclN0N4Eg Testato per due mesi. Poi approvato in emergenza. No…
@NoGenderBenders @AlanPlotzker @CharlieZxi1 @jonathanstea So you think that more people should have gotten (or not gotten) Covid? Good thing there have bene more trials: https://t.co/Qor98RkQLO https://t.co/sUGEHJlCIi
@FFroodle @MRobertsQLD @VDejan0000 more nonsense. Read the trial publication. It reviews AEs and SAEs for the placebo and intervention cohorts. https://t.co/RDOqFuljQe
@Petunia22255042 @GetMeCash @PierrePoilievre You are a fucking moron! "BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups defined by age, se
@2Pikey @demandevidence1 @AaronSiriSG Evidence on mRNA vaccine trial using placebos. Still not good enough for you for some reason. https://t.co/6bIA1YLT1E
@sandrala46 @PierrePoilievre What a fucking moronic post! "BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups defined by age, sex, race," ht
@JeremyFOUBERT1 @gentiane15800 @VivienMe @musashiyann @FCavernes @ludovic_guerre @THEVENONPierri1 @SaiyanBio @BioHospitalix La fameuse numéro de chez Pfizer oui. Le vaccin Pfizer a été testé pour la sécurité et l'efficacité sur les formes graves et les dé
@LMLYPN @Alchemywizzard @Treb35_ @Debunk_the_Funk A myth about a myth! The clinical trials documented vaccinated people getting Covid. It documented that vaccines significantly REDUCED Covid, but did not claim to eradicate it. Shame so many people get th
@Alchemywizzard @Debunk_the_Funk Good to reveal your lies. Meanwhile, vaccines work by REDUCING the number of people who once infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus get Covid. As documented in the clinical trials. Shame so many got that basic fact wrong. h
@Alchemywizzard @Debunk_the_Funk Vaccines work by REDUCING the number of people who when infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus get Covid, and severity of Covid for those who get it. Just like the clinical trials documented. https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
@SharonLenz19 @zap_lock Ahem
RT @SanctionsK: @ADdelMale @ElideMirce La mia fonte è questa https://t.co/3UclN0N4Eg Testato per due mesi. Poi approvato in emergenza. No…
RT @SanctionsK: @ADdelMale @ElideMirce La mia fonte è questa https://t.co/3UclN0N4Eg Testato per due mesi. Poi approvato in emergenza. No…